Tech, emailconfirmed, Administrators
38,200
edits
No edit summary Tags: thread closure 2017 source edit |
|||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{archive}} | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | ||
== Introduction == | == Introduction == | ||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
Long story short; we've basically lost our only two possible leads in finding out for certain that this was licensed. ''Maybe'' I'm wrong about the book and there's actually more to it than what Amazon's digital preview provides, but the outlook isn't looking good. [[User:WaltK|WaltK]] [[User talk:WaltK|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 16:40, 6 September 2023 (UTC) | Long story short; we've basically lost our only two possible leads in finding out for certain that this was licensed. ''Maybe'' I'm wrong about the book and there's actually more to it than what Amazon's digital preview provides, but the outlook isn't looking good. [[User:WaltK|WaltK]] [[User talk:WaltK|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 16:40, 6 September 2023 (UTC) | ||
: Well, in my opinion, we should presume this wasn't licensed unless further proof against this idea arises. If it turns out in 6 months that there's an interview with Seth MacFarlane calling this licensed - fine, we'll restore the page. But as it stands, with no credits and this entire thing being based on a BBC website promoting the episode... I don't believe this was licensed. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]][[User Talk:OttselSpy25|🤙☎️]] 21:49, 6 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
== Conclusion == | |||
<div class="tech"> | |||
Right, what [[User:OttselSpy25]] said. We have no evidence that this is licensed and no particular reason to assume it should be. All it warrants for the time being is mentions at [[Cultural references to the Doctor Who universe/2010s]] and [[List of fan works in which official actors reprised their roles]]. The page itself should be made a redirect to the former, and associated pages deleted. If it transpires that it was somehow licensed after all, we'll recreate it. | |||
Whether [[Family Guy (series)]] itself should remain under the circumstances is probably a topic for [[Forum:Real world franchises with DWU connections: Qualification speedround]]. | |||
As always, thanks to everyone who participated in this thread. [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|'''Scrooge MacDuck''']] [[User_talk:Scrooge MacDuck|⊕]] 13:20, 7 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
</div> |