Talk:First Day of the Doctor (short story): Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Created page with "Does this mean that mentions of the Fifteenth Doctor and Ruby aren't spoilers any more? For stuff like FanArtFriday. ~~~~") Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit 2017 source edit |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Does this mean that mentions of the Fifteenth Doctor and Ruby aren't spoilers any more? For stuff like [[FanArtFriday]]. [[User:Aquanafrahudy|<span style="font-family: serif; color: pink" title="Hallo." > Aquanafrahudy</span>]] [[User talk: Aquanafrahudy|<span title="Talk to me">📢</span>]] 15:30, 7 September 2023 (UTC) | Does this mean that mentions of the Fifteenth Doctor and Ruby aren't spoilers any more? For stuff like [[FanArtFriday]]. [[User:Aquanafrahudy|<span style="font-family: serif; color: pink" title="Hallo." > Aquanafrahudy</span>]] [[User talk: Aquanafrahudy|<span title="Talk to me">📢</span>]] 15:30, 7 September 2023 (UTC) | ||
: Technically one could argue that what they ''look'' like is still a spoiler… but taking you literally, ''mentions'' of them are fine, yes. [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|'''Scrooge MacDuck''']] [[User_talk:Scrooge MacDuck|⊕]] 15:38, 7 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
:: Fifteen is on the cover of the annual so I don't think it would be a spoiler ''there''. Covers are perfectly usable to illustrate articles after all. {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 15:41, 7 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
::: Ah, is he? Alright then. (Though as to the practicalities of using a cover to illustrate fictional elements of an anthology like an Annual, there are certainl ongoing controversies, we must recall…) [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|'''Scrooge MacDuck''']] [[User_talk:Scrooge MacDuck|⊕]] 16:06, 7 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
:::: heh. {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 16:13, 7 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:13, 7 September 2023
Does this mean that mentions of the Fifteenth Doctor and Ruby aren't spoilers any more? For stuff like FanArtFriday. Aquanafrahudy 📢 15:30, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
- Technically one could argue that what they look like is still a spoiler… but taking you literally, mentions of them are fine, yes. Scrooge MacDuck ⊕ 15:38, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
- Fifteen is on the cover of the annual so I don't think it would be a spoiler there. Covers are perfectly usable to illustrate articles after all. 15:41, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
- Ah, is he? Alright then. (Though as to the practicalities of using a cover to illustrate fictional elements of an anthology like an Annual, there are certainl ongoing controversies, we must recall…) Scrooge MacDuck ⊕ 16:06, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
- heh. 16:13, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
- Ah, is he? Alright then. (Though as to the practicalities of using a cover to illustrate fictional elements of an anthology like an Annual, there are certainl ongoing controversies, we must recall…) Scrooge MacDuck ⊕ 16:06, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
- Fifteen is on the cover of the annual so I don't think it would be a spoiler there. Covers are perfectly usable to illustrate articles after all. 15:41, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
