1,847
edits
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit 2017 source edit |
mNo edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit 2017 source edit |
||
Line 2,178: | Line 2,178: | ||
:::: @Ettolrahc How would you define an otherwise-DWU work, though? | :::: @Ettolrahc How would you define an otherwise-DWU work, though? | ||
:::: @Scrooge I still fail to see why Doctor Whoah! should be invalid, save for the fact that "it doesn't exactly look very good for us to cover this on [[Ninth Doctor]]"/"covering this on Ninth Doctor would just be silly", which I don't find very good arguments. [[User:Aquanafrahudy|<span style="font-family: serif; color: pink" title="Hallo." > Aquanafrahudy</span>]] [[User talk: Aquanafrahudy|<span title="Talk to me">📢</span>]] 09:32, 22 September 2023 (UTC) | :::: @Scrooge I still fail to see why Doctor Whoah! should be invalid, save for the fact that "it doesn't exactly look very good for us to cover this on [[Ninth Doctor]]"/"covering this on Ninth Doctor would just be silly", which I don't find very good arguments. [[User:Aquanafrahudy|<span style="font-family: serif; color: pink" title="Hallo." > Aquanafrahudy</span>]] [[User talk: Aquanafrahudy|<span title="Talk to me">📢</span>]] 09:32, 22 September 2023 (UTC) | ||
:::::@Aqua, I use the term "otherwise-DWU work" to refer to a work of fiction which would be considered "part of the DWU" whether or not the source in question is valid or invalid. For example, {{cs|The Time of the Doctor (TV story)}} is otherwise-DWU to {{cs|Erasing Sherlock (novel)}}, so if ''Time'' referenced ''Erasing'', that would be a r4bp case if ''Erasing'' had previously been deemed to not take place in the DWU, but a work of fiction which is a sequel to ''Erasing'' but no other work, wouldn't (in my mind). [[User:Cousin Ettolrhc|Cousin Ettolrahc]] [[User talk:Cousin Ettolrhc|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 09:44, 22 September 2023 (UTC) |
edits