Forum:Classic and New: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Created page with "{{Forumheader|The Panopticon}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> This is an idea I've had for a while which I think is particularly relevant now. Basically, I feel we could use a page which covers the divide between "Classic Who" and "New Who" and perhaps the "New New Who" as well. I see it as being like the page for canon in that it would collect references from official sources and authors. It could...") Tag: 2017 source edit |
OttselSpy25 (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | ||
This is an idea I've had for a while which I think is particularly relevant now. Basically, I feel we could use a page which covers the divide between "Classic Who" and "New Who" and perhaps the "New New Who" as well. I see it as being like the page for [[canon]] in that it would collect references from official sources and authors. It could cover anything from the existence of [[Doctor Who website|separate classic and new series BBC websites]], to [[Big Finish Productions]]' expansion to post-2005 content (as highlighted in [[Classic Doctors, New Monsters]]), their being listed as separate titles on platforms such as the new [[Whoniverse (BBC iPlayer)|Whoniverse]] and even the "No classics? No 50th!!" gag from ''[[The Five(ish) Doctors Reboot]]''. [[User:MrThermomanPreacher|MrThermomanPreacher]] [[User talk:MrThermomanPreacher|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 00:56, 26 November 2023 (UTC) | This is an idea I've had for a while which I think is particularly relevant now. Basically, I feel we could use a page which covers the divide between "Classic Who" and "New Who" and perhaps the "New New Who" as well. I see it as being like the page for [[canon]] in that it would collect references from official sources and authors. It could cover anything from the existence of [[Doctor Who website|separate classic and new series BBC websites]], to [[Big Finish Productions]]' expansion to post-2005 content (as highlighted in [[Classic Doctors, New Monsters]]), their being listed as separate titles on platforms such as the new [[Whoniverse (BBC iPlayer)|Whoniverse]] and even the "No classics? No 50th!!" gag from ''[[The Five(ish) Doctors Reboot]]''. [[User:MrThermomanPreacher|MrThermomanPreacher]] [[User talk:MrThermomanPreacher|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 00:56, 26 November 2023 (UTC) | ||
:I support this. I'd also like pages on [[RTD1]] and [[RTD2]], and just generally any other official "era" terminology. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]][[User Talk:OttselSpy25|🤙☎️]] 01:50, 26 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:50, 26 November 2023
Index → The Panopticon → Classic and New
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
This is an idea I've had for a while which I think is particularly relevant now. Basically, I feel we could use a page which covers the divide between "Classic Who" and "New Who" and perhaps the "New New Who" as well. I see it as being like the page for canon in that it would collect references from official sources and authors. It could cover anything from the existence of separate classic and new series BBC websites, to Big Finish Productions' expansion to post-2005 content (as highlighted in Classic Doctors, New Monsters), their being listed as separate titles on platforms such as the new Whoniverse and even the "No classics? No 50th!!" gag from The Five(ish) Doctors Reboot. MrThermomanPreacher ☎ 00:56, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
