Talk:Fear of the Future (comic story): Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
::::: (also, I had initially only seen [[2 (number)|2]] images, at [https://twitter.com/spoorkk/status/1539825669777096704 this link]) [[User:Cookieboy 2005|Cookieboy 2005]] [[User talk:Cookieboy 2005|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:12, 23 June 2022 (UTC) | ::::: (also, I had initially only seen [[2 (number)|2]] images, at [https://twitter.com/spoorkk/status/1539825669777096704 this link]) [[User:Cookieboy 2005|Cookieboy 2005]] [[User talk:Cookieboy 2005|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:12, 23 June 2022 (UTC) | ||
::::: I really do not believe intentional whitewashing would've gotten past the editors and the BBC. Hence why I think it's an error. But it is off, I agree. Perhaps a statement will be issued in the next few days by DWM on Twitter, clarifying the situation? <div style="background-color:#0E234E; border: solid 0.5px gold; display: inline; white-space: nowrap;">[[doctorwho:user:Epsilon the Eternal|<span style="background:#0E234E; color:white"><code>Epsilon</code></span>]][[doctorwho:user talk:Epsilon the Eternal|📯]] [[doctorwho:special:Contributions/Epsilon the Eternal|📂]]</div> 20:51, 23 June 2022 (UTC) | :::::: I really do not believe intentional whitewashing would've gotten past the editors and the BBC. Hence why I think it's an error. But it is off, I agree. Perhaps a statement will be issued in the next few days by DWM on Twitter, clarifying the situation? <div style="background-color:#0E234E; border: solid 0.5px gold; display: inline; white-space: nowrap;">[[doctorwho:user:Epsilon the Eternal|<span style="background:#0E234E; color:white"><code>Epsilon</code></span>]][[doctorwho:user talk:Epsilon the Eternal|📯]] [[doctorwho:special:Contributions/Epsilon the Eternal|📂]]</div> 20:51, 23 June 2022 (UTC) | ||
::::::: I certainly expect they'll say something about it, seeing people's reactions on [[Twitter]] (a space they're known to patrol). [[User:Cookieboy 2005|Cookieboy 2005]] [[User talk:Cookieboy 2005|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:58, 23 June 2022 (UTC) | |||
:: So, what was the conclusion to this? Did they release a Twitter statement? [[User:BananaClownMan|BananaClownMan]] [[User talk:BananaClownMan|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 07:40, 17 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
::: No responses that I've been made aware of. [[User:WaltK|WaltK]] [[User talk:WaltK|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:11, 14 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 21:11, 14 January 2024
Colourisation[[edit source]]
Can it be claimed that this depiction of Yaz is whitewashing? It is, but it currently just says "Oddly, Yaz is depicted as having uncharacteristically light skin." Cookieboy 2005 ☎ 16:08, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- (I'm essentially asking if it can be mentioned as 'whitewashing' on this page) Cookieboy 2005 ☎ 16:23, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Personally, I do not think this is a case of whitewashing. To me, this feels like a production error, probably due to the printing process rendering inks in the wrong shade; you can tell the tones of the skin between Thirteen and Yaz are different. 17:11, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- About it potentially being a production error: the fact there is one single panel where her skin is suddenly way closer to her actual skin colour makes me unsure. WaltK ☎ 18:42, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Whether it's a production error or an intentional decision, it just feels... off to me - and to my mother, too; she couldn't identify who it was. Cookieboy 2005 ☎ 19:53, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- (also, I had initially only seen 2 images, at this link) Cookieboy 2005 ☎ 20:12, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Whether it's a production error or an intentional decision, it just feels... off to me - and to my mother, too; she couldn't identify who it was. Cookieboy 2005 ☎ 19:53, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- About it potentially being a production error: the fact there is one single panel where her skin is suddenly way closer to her actual skin colour makes me unsure. WaltK ☎ 18:42, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- I really do not believe intentional whitewashing would've gotten past the editors and the BBC. Hence why I think it's an error. But it is off, I agree. Perhaps a statement will be issued in the next few days by DWM on Twitter, clarifying the situation? 20:51, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- I certainly expect they'll say something about it, seeing people's reactions on Twitter (a space they're known to patrol). Cookieboy 2005 ☎ 20:58, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- I really do not believe intentional whitewashing would've gotten past the editors and the BBC. Hence why I think it's an error. But it is off, I agree. Perhaps a statement will be issued in the next few days by DWM on Twitter, clarifying the situation? 20:51, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- So, what was the conclusion to this? Did they release a Twitter statement? BananaClownMan ☎ 07:40, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
