Trusted
8,503
edits
→Discussion
| Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
:::: I think the Dalek annuals precedent is the relevant one here: this is a story made under the Doctor Who license regardless of whether it elects to use any of the elements of that license, and we cover it on that basis, like the Dalek-less Dalek-annual stories. | :::: I think the Dalek annuals precedent is the relevant one here: this is a story made under the Doctor Who license regardless of whether it elects to use any of the elements of that license, and we cover it on that basis, like the Dalek-less Dalek-annual stories. | ||
:::: I mean, that may be so, but I think the obvious precedent that nobody has yet brought up is the ''[[Fanboys (short story)|Fanboys]]'' precedent - it has no DWU licensed elements of its own except those portrayed in an out of universe manner. Also [[The Airzone Solution (novelisation)]]. There is clear precedent for this sort of thing. {{User:Aquanafrahudy/Sig}} 18:25, 19 July 2024 (UTC) | :::: I mean, that may be so, but I think the obvious precedent that nobody has yet brought up is the ''[[Fanboys (short story)|Fanboys]]'' precedent - it has no DWU licensed elements of its own except those portrayed in an out of universe manner. Also [[The Airzone Solution (novelisation)]]. There is clear precedent for this sort of thing. {{User:Aquanafrahudy/Sig}} 18:25, 19 July 2024 (UTC) | ||
::::''Fanboys'' is set within a larger anthology, so not analogous imo, it's automatically creating ''new'' DWU IP. (I did think about ''Fanboys'' as a possible counter example, but dismissed it for this reason.) Didn't comment on the Dalek Annuals stuff before b/c I forgot. My response is that it all falls under this basic idea, and AAiSaT doesn't. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 18:40, 19 July 2024 (UTC) | |||