Trusted
49,498
edits
Forum:Validity: An Adventure in Space and Time: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
→Discussion
| Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
:: They very much contain fictive information. {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 18:30, 19 July 2024 (UTC) | :: They very much contain fictive information. {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 18:30, 19 July 2024 (UTC) | ||
:::I think the Dalek annuals precedent is the relevant one here: this is a story made under the Doctor Who license regardless of whether it elects to use any of the elements of that license, and we cover it on that basis, like the Dalek-less Dalek-annual stories. | :::: I think the Dalek annuals precedent is the relevant one here: this is a story made under the Doctor Who license regardless of whether it elects to use any of the elements of that license, and we cover it on that basis, like the Dalek-less Dalek-annual stories. | ||
:: I mean, that may be so, but I think the obvious precedent that nobody has yet brought up is the ''[[Fanboys (short story)|Fanboys]]'' precedent - it has no DWU licensed elements of its own except those portrayed in an out of universe manner. Also [[The Airzone Solution (novelisation)]]. There is clear precedent for this sort of thing. {{User:Aquanafrahudy/Sig}} 18:25, 19 July 2024 (UTC) | :::: I mean, that may be so, but I think the obvious precedent that nobody has yet brought up is the ''[[Fanboys (short story)|Fanboys]]'' precedent - it has no DWU licensed elements of its own except those portrayed in an out of universe manner. Also [[The Airzone Solution (novelisation)]]. There is clear precedent for this sort of thing. {{User:Aquanafrahudy/Sig}} 18:25, 19 July 2024 (UTC) | ||
