Bureaucrats, content-moderator, emailconfirmed, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Administrators, threadmoderator
85,404
edits
More actions
→Signing
| Line 154: | Line 154: | ||
:I don't think they should, the discontinuity pages are there for information, so while it is opinion in there it's more like informed opinion than personal opinion (which is what goes on in the rest of the Forum). --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 14:44, May 19, 2010 (UTC) | :I don't think they should, the discontinuity pages are there for information, so while it is opinion in there it's more like informed opinion than personal opinion (which is what goes on in the rest of the Forum). --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 14:44, May 19, 2010 (UTC) | ||
::Should i tidy them up if i can be bothered then? Perhaps someone could also modify the <nowiki>{{Discontinuity}}</nowiki> template --[[User:Lord Aro|Lord Aro]] 12:40, May 20, 2010 (UTC) | ::Should i tidy them up if i can be bothered then? Perhaps someone could also modify the <nowiki>{{Discontinuity}}</nowiki> template --[[User:Lord Aro|Lord Aro]] 12:40, May 20, 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::I'd disagree with [[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]]. They're ''completely'' forum pages. They are ''totally'' personal opinion. They aren't any more informed than anything that goes on at Gallifrey Base. I have no problem with signatures; the only reason they aren't there now is that it would have been unnecessarily difficult to have tracked down who said what when the points were on the mainspace article pages. '''[[User:CzechOut|<span style="background:blue;color:white">Czech</span><span style="background:red;color:white">Out</span>]]''' [[User talk:CzechOut|☎]] | [[Special:Contributions/CzechOut|<font size="+1">✍</font>]] 20:40, June 17, 2010 (UTC) | |||
==Formatting== | ==Formatting== | ||