Bureaucrats, content-moderator, emailconfirmed, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Administrators, threadmoderator
85,404
edits
Forum:Discontinuity revisited: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
→Formatting
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 248: | Line 248: | ||
:::::::::I think the real issue is that people _don't_ know how to use it, but it only really matters on the active pages. Although that's just as good an argument against my idea, come to think of it--if people can't even figure out how to indent things, what are the changes they're going to figure out how to maintain an outline numbering system? --[[User:Falcotron|Falcotron]] 02:55, June 9, 2010 (UTC) | :::::::::I think the real issue is that people _don't_ know how to use it, but it only really matters on the active pages. Although that's just as good an argument against my idea, come to think of it--if people can't even figure out how to indent things, what are the changes they're going to figure out how to maintain an outline numbering system? --[[User:Falcotron|Falcotron]] 02:55, June 9, 2010 (UTC) | ||
::I honestly can't see the problem. The present system is ''perfectly'' adequate for a '''forum page'''. We don't need to change it, especially if such a change would obligate us to go back and change the hundreds of extant pages. If we introduce a more complicated "format", it'll only hinder the discussion. We want to keep it as simple as it can possibly be. If it really bugs you that ''Cold Blood'' is a bit confusing, just go back and edit it to the proper level of indentation. Personally, I really wouldn't bother because, again, '''these are forum pages, not mainspace article pages'''. '''[[User:CzechOut|<span style="background:blue;color:white">Czech</span><span style="background:red;color:white">Out</span>]]''' [[User talk:CzechOut|☎]] | [[Special:Contributions/CzechOut|<font size="+1">✍</font>]] 20:37, June 17, 2010 (UTC) | |||
