Trusted
6,338
edits
More actions
Forum:The LEGO Dimensions Conundrum, Reconsidered (edit)
Revision as of 17:55, 5 September 2024
, 5 September→LEGO Dimensions coverage discussion
| Line 577: | Line 577: | ||
:Always nice to see you around OS25. And I get where you're coming from. But even without [[Talk:Howling Halls/Archive 1]] and everything after setting very strong precedent the other way, I do think there are Sorites style concerns here. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 17:45, 5 September 2024 (UTC) | :Always nice to see you around OS25. And I get where you're coming from. But even without [[Talk:Howling Halls/Archive 1]] and everything after setting very strong precedent the other way, I do think there are Sorites style concerns here. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 17:45, 5 September 2024 (UTC) | ||
:: (written before Najawin's post) Well, this is a forum thread in the Panopticon, it does ''have'' the power to change policy. Perhaps enshrining a sort of "Dude, come on," clause into [[T:VS]], if you will, wouldn't be such a bad idea. Ultimately, our validity rules should have some semblance of common sense to them, otherwise, well, we find ourselves in all sorts of various ridiculous states of affairs. | |||
::(in response to Najawin) Could you elaborate on your concerns? {{User:Aquanafrahudy/Sig}} 17:52, 5 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ''LEGO Dimensions'' validity discussion == | == ''LEGO Dimensions'' validity discussion == | ||