Talk:Attack: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:::: "Attack" is also a noun... [[User:Cookieboy 2005|Cookieboy 2005]] [[User talk:Cookieboy 2005|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 17:48, 18 November 2024 (UTC) | :::: "Attack" is also a noun... [[User:Cookieboy 2005|Cookieboy 2005]] [[User talk:Cookieboy 2005|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 17:48, 18 November 2024 (UTC) | ||
::::: Not in the usage case cited. It's not "Hercules's Attacks", it's "Hercules attacks [someone or something]". {{User:Aquanafrahudy/Sig}} 20:18, 18 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:18, 18 November 2024
Conjecture problems
Leaving a quick note: I don't think that a conjectural title should be used to form the basis of a concept page like this. Verb/noun policies aside, the word "attacks" isn’t even fully visible in the given example. Fennel Soup ☎ 22:11, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Part of the word does appear in the source, so I feel like that's probably enough for a conjecture page - the word has surely been used elsewhere in stuff we cover, though. Cookieboy 2005 ☎ 22:13, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- To be clear, I'm not saying that the existence of the conjecturally titled page Hercules Attacks is a problem. I'm saying that this page ("Attack") should not use a conjectural instance of the verb "attacks" as its only/lead example for various reasons. As you've just mentioned, there are certainly actual instances of "attack" out there that we could use instead. Fennel Soup ☎ 23:17, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Articles on common verbs like this just shouldn't exist at all. Aquanafrahudy 📢 🖊️ 16:18, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- "Attack" is also a noun... Cookieboy 2005 ☎ 17:48, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Not in the usage case cited. It's not "Hercules's Attacks", it's "Hercules attacks [someone or something]". Aquanafrahudy 📢 🖊️ 20:18, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
