Talk:The Mind Robber (TV story): Difference between revisions
TheangelJean (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Frankly, I'm a bit of a literalist about these sorts of things, so discussions like this make my eyes either 1) roll, or 2) glaze over. :)--[[User:Jesster2|Jesster2]] 18:34, July 26, 2010 (UTC) | Frankly, I'm a bit of a literalist about these sorts of things, so discussions like this make my eyes either 1) roll, or 2) glaze over. :)--[[User:Jesster2|Jesster2]] 18:34, July 26, 2010 (UTC) | ||
*Heh. I guess I should have looked harder, when I checked whose toes I might be stepping on ... It turns out to have been added by an anonymous IP who made a bunch of edits on July 23 2008, and none since. I agree with you and I would call it unfounded speculation ... I'm going to do a Google search for sources, and if I don't find anything I'm just going to remove it. [[User:TheangelJean|the angel Jean - Smith's little elf]] 06:52, July 27, 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:52, 27 July 2010
I know the Firebird Trilogy had not been written when the story aired...
...but is there an in-universe reason why the master computer did not simply have someone from that 'verse appear and put the Doctor, Jamie, and Zoë under voice-command and make them submit? The Land of Fiction includes every story ever, you know. Tawaki 04:15, July 22, 2010 (UTC)
It can be argued that the events of episodes 2-5 are a dream by the Doctor...
Very interesting. I would really like to know about
- who has made this argument,
- why they thought this was the case,
- whether it's been interpreted in this way in any other source, like a reference in any other episode or other media?, and
- how this perspective on the story might be useful. (I can see bits and bobs of this last part in the paragraph that is currently there, but it doesn't quite come together for me.)
More details please! the angel Jean - Smith's little elf 09:06, July 26, 2010 (UTC)
Re: It can be argued...
Hi angel, I actually didn't make the claim, I don't know who did. I merely moved the comment into what I thought was a more appropriate heading than it was in.
Frankly, I'm a bit of a literalist about these sorts of things, so discussions like this make my eyes either 1) roll, or 2) glaze over. :)--Jesster2 18:34, July 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Heh. I guess I should have looked harder, when I checked whose toes I might be stepping on ... It turns out to have been added by an anonymous IP who made a bunch of edits on July 23 2008, and none since. I agree with you and I would call it unfounded speculation ... I'm going to do a Google search for sources, and if I don't find anything I'm just going to remove it. the angel Jean - Smith's little elf 06:52, July 27, 2010 (UTC)
