Forum:Layout: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(GAH. sorry.)
(sorry about that)
Line 13: Line 13:
:@Skittles: Is it against the policies to alter the policies to win an argument? --[[User:Bold Clone|<span style="color:blue">'''Bold'''</span>]] [[User Talk:Bold Clone|<span style="color:gold">'''Clone'''</span>]] 20:35, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
:@Skittles: Is it against the policies to alter the policies to win an argument? --[[User:Bold Clone|<span style="color:blue">'''Bold'''</span>]] [[User Talk:Bold Clone|<span style="color:gold">'''Clone'''</span>]] 20:35, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
:Other episodes maybe?--[[User:Skittles the hog|Skittles the hog]]--<small>[[User talk:Skittles the hog|Talk]]</small> 20:37, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
:Other episodes maybe?--[[User:Skittles the hog|Skittles the hog]]--<small>[[User talk:Skittles the hog|Talk]]</small> 20:37, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
:the policies were altered as an example and not to win an arguement. [[User:Revanvolatrelundar|Revanvolatrelundar]] 20:44, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
:...OK...sorry for the misunderstanding there...but I think it would be better to just propose the idea to Tangerineduel first. --[[User:Bold Clone|<span style="color:blue">'''Bold'''</span>]] [[User Talk:Bold Clone|<span style="color:gold">'''Clone'''</span>]] 20:47, January 5, 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:47, 5 January 2011

IndexPanopticon → Layout
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.

The Manual of style says that See also follows Behind the scenes. Surely it should be before as it is in-universe.--Skittles the hog--Talk 20:21, January 5, 2011 (UTC)

Actually, the layout doesn't say anything regarding 'see also'. --Bold Clone 20:25, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
I agree that behind the scenes should be kept seperate as it is out of universe. Revanvolatrelundar 20:27, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
We're not talking of merging them, though. We're arguing whether 'See also' comes before 'Behind the scenes' section or not. --Bold Clone 20:29, January 5, 2011 (UTC)

I put See also (in-universe) before. Tardis:Manual of Style. Thoughts?--Skittles the hog--Talk 20:28, January 5, 2011 (UTC)

What's the different between in-universe and out-universe 'See also'? --Bold Clone 20:30, January 5, 2011 (UTC)

User:Bold Clone reverted it.--Skittles the hog--Talk 20:31, January 5, 2011 (UTC)

I cant see what we could put as an out of universe see also, as most articles on this wikia are in universe. Revanvolatrelundar 20:32, January 5, 2011 (UTC)

@Skittles: Is it against the policies to alter the policies to win an argument? --Bold Clone 20:35, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
Other episodes maybe?--Skittles the hog--Talk 20:37, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
the policies were altered as an example and not to win an arguement. Revanvolatrelundar 20:44, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
...OK...sorry for the misunderstanding there...but I think it would be better to just propose the idea to Tangerineduel first. --Bold Clone 20:47, January 5, 2011 (UTC)