User talk:Mini-mitch/Archive Talk 4: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(→Take the long view: new section) |
||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
==Creating protecting== | ==Creating protecting== | ||
After I left the message to you I had a think and I've now added a section called "How to create protect pages" to the [[Tardis:Guide for new administrators]] with images to show the process of going about it, hope it helps. It used to be less complicated, but following Wikia's re-design there's these extra steps to get away from the edit box. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 13:13, February 7, 2011 (UTC) | After I left the message to you I had a think and I've now added a section called "How to create protect pages" to the [[Tardis:Guide for new administrators]] with images to show the process of going about it, hope it helps. It used to be less complicated, but following Wikia's re-design there's these extra steps to get away from the edit box. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 13:13, February 7, 2011 (UTC) | ||
== Take the long view == | |||
I note that you've just deleted a lot of properly disambiguated generic character names — like Secretary (Frontier in Space) — on the basis that there's no other character at that name now. Please stop deleting things on the basis that "nothing else of this name exists" or "nothing links here". What you're failing to consider is that something else ''might'' link there in the future. For instance, the category, [[:category:human secretaries|human secretaries]] and [[:category:secretaries]], implies that a generic article about the job of a secretary could easily be written. More to the point, it's absolutely conceivable that another character named "secretary" could come along. So the future-proofing of this article by naming it [[Secretary (Frontier in Space)]] has now been lost. Just about ''any'' characters who take their name by their job title should be disambiguated so as to allow for the possibility of other characters similarly-named in the future. There will be other thieves than the one at [[Thief (13 O'Clock)]] (and with the presence of Lady Christina, Rayne, and this new first Doctor companion that Big Finish are doing, there's a need for a generic article about thieves). There might well be other cell guards, desk sergeant, cashier, car salesmen, and American sergeants in the future. Indeed, there might '''already be''' such characters, '''but we just haven't written the article yet.''' We only have 21K articles. We're nowhere ''close'' to having an exhaustive catalogue of all characters in the DWU yet. Please take the long view and allow room for us to grow our coverage, rather than ''creating'' work for people to undo later. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} | |||
Revision as of 16:56, 9 February 2011
oops
Accidentally reverted you edit to Trickster's Brigade.--Skittles the hog--Talk 21:57, February 4, 2011 (UTC)
Your input is needed!
You are invited to join the discussion at Forum:comic strip, comic story, comic.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍
Policy
Just curious; the current edit war policy is '4 reverts in 36 hours', right? However, I'm wondering if we could add a statement about a min/max time, like saying '2 reverts' as a min. and a notice about 'gaming the system' or getting around the current policy. My goal here is to restrict the possibility of future edits wars. --Bold Clone 22:31, February 4, 2011 (UTC)
K9
Hey, no big thing, but you probably need to cast a glance over Tardis:K9 naming convention, especially focussing on the exceptions listed. K-9's Finest Hour should remain hyphenated, even though K9 generally is unhyphenated. Also, if you have questions about making a move/delete/change, as you apparently did, it does no harm asking other admin. You're not expected to know everything just because someone changed your user flag :)
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍
Guide for new admins
I've created a guide: Tardis:Guide for new administrators it includes a few things I've learnt along the way and some useful information which you may already know or find out as you work your way around as an admin. --Tangerineduel / talk 14:04, February 5, 2011 (UTC)
Create protecting and other protection
Hey, best not to cascade protect any article, this protects everything that's linked on that page. So say The Pandorica Opens is cascade protected this would mean Daleks, Sontarans, Judoon, 1963, 1890 and every other link is also protected. (According to the delete log you cascade protected the Dorium page)
Protecting a page and then deleting it wipes the protection from the page, I've create-protected the page you deleted/restores/protected/deleted as I assumed that was where you were trying to go with it. Any questions please ask. --Tangerineduel / talk 16:46, February 6, 2011 (UTC)
???
Why are you creating all these X stories categories. The Terrible Zodin has never appeared in Doctor Who so they are not stories regarding her.--Skittles the hog--Talk 19:34, February 6, 2011 (UTC)
You must have misread the article, it does say "Mentions". The Terrible Zodin is a sort of Running Joke. Heard of but never seen.--Skittles the hog--Talk 19:41, February 6, 2011 (UTC)
On another unrelated topic, when you click the arrow to file a category. Instead of filling under *, hit the spacebar so that it files under [blank]. Petty, I know, but better.--Skittles the hog--Talk 19:47, February 6, 2011 (UTC)
Creating protecting
After I left the message to you I had a think and I've now added a section called "How to create protect pages" to the Tardis:Guide for new administrators with images to show the process of going about it, hope it helps. It used to be less complicated, but following Wikia's re-design there's these extra steps to get away from the edit box. --Tangerineduel / talk 13:13, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
Take the long view
I note that you've just deleted a lot of properly disambiguated generic character names — like Secretary (Frontier in Space) — on the basis that there's no other character at that name now. Please stop deleting things on the basis that "nothing else of this name exists" or "nothing links here". What you're failing to consider is that something else might link there in the future. For instance, the category, human secretaries and category:secretaries, implies that a generic article about the job of a secretary could easily be written. More to the point, it's absolutely conceivable that another character named "secretary" could come along. So the future-proofing of this article by naming it Secretary (Frontier in Space) has now been lost. Just about any characters who take their name by their job title should be disambiguated so as to allow for the possibility of other characters similarly-named in the future. There will be other thieves than the one at Thief (13 O'Clock) (and with the presence of Lady Christina, Rayne, and this new first Doctor companion that Big Finish are doing, there's a need for a generic article about thieves). There might well be other cell guards, desk sergeant, cashier, car salesmen, and American sergeants in the future. Indeed, there might already be such characters, but we just haven't written the article yet. We only have 21K articles. We're nowhere close to having an exhaustive catalogue of all characters in the DWU yet. Please take the long view and allow room for us to grow our coverage, rather than creating work for people to undo later.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍
