33,205
edits
More actions
→Amy's Ganger
Mini-mitch (talk | contribs) |
Mini-mitch (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
Do not add anything about Ganger Amy to any page bar [[Amy Pond (Ganger)|this one]]. This is primarily due to the reason that we have not been told by an inuniverse source when she was replaced. Thanks. [[User:Mini-mitch|Mini-mitch]]\[[User talk:Mini-mitch|talk]] 17:59, May 29, 2011 (UTC) | Do not add anything about Ganger Amy to any page bar [[Amy Pond (Ganger)|this one]]. This is primarily due to the reason that we have not been told by an inuniverse source when she was replaced. Thanks. [[User:Mini-mitch|Mini-mitch]]\[[User talk:Mini-mitch|talk]] 17:59, May 29, 2011 (UTC) | ||
:Doctor Who Confidential may have said it, but that is not an inuniverse source. An uninverse source is a television story, prose story, etc. Also producers can lie. Remember when they said no Classic monsters were returning? That was a lie. So could this. We need to wait till we are told inuniverse. Thanks. [[User:Mini-mitch|Mini-mitch]]\[[User talk:Mini-mitch|talk]] 18:05, May 29, 2011 (UTC) | :Doctor Who Confidential may have said it, but that is not an inuniverse source. An uninverse source is a television story, prose story, etc. Also producers can lie. Remember when they said no Classic monsters were returning? That was a lie. So could this. We need to wait till we are told inuniverse. Thanks. [[User:Mini-mitch|Mini-mitch]]\[[User talk:Mini-mitch|talk]] 18:05, May 29, 2011 (UTC) | ||
::Thank you for pointing that out. It has now been dealt with. [[User:Mini-mitch|Mini-mitch]]\[[User talk:Mini-mitch|talk]] 18:10, May 29, 2011 (UTC) | |||