Talk:Shada (novelisation): Difference between revisions
Josiah Rowe (talk | contribs) |
Shambala108 (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tag: sourceedit |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I don't remember where Roberts uses the terms "fixed point in time" and "time lock". If anybody else does, please edit the reference section accordingly, to note the context in which those terms appear in this book. Thanks! —[[User:Josiah Rowe|Josiah Rowe]] <sup>[[User talk:Josiah Rowe|talk to me]]</sup> 05:37, June 11, 2012 (UTC) | I don't remember where Roberts uses the terms "fixed point in time" and "time lock". If anybody else does, please edit the reference section accordingly, to note the context in which those terms appear in this book. Thanks! —[[User:Josiah Rowe|Josiah Rowe]] <sup>[[User talk:Josiah Rowe|talk to me]]</sup> 05:37, June 11, 2012 (UTC) | ||
:Found the time lock, but I'm still looking for the fixed point in time. —[[User:Josiah Rowe|Josiah Rowe]] <sup>[[User talk:Josiah Rowe|talk to me]]</sup> 04:34, June 13, 2012 (UTC) | :Found the time lock, but I'm still looking for the fixed point in time. —[[User:Josiah Rowe|Josiah Rowe]] <sup>[[User talk:Josiah Rowe|talk to me]]</sup> 04:34, June 13, 2012 (UTC) | ||
== Invalid source == | |||
It was decided at [[Forum:Are_deleted_scenes_canon%3F|Forum:Are deleted scenes canon?]] that deleted scenes, including [[Shada (TV story)|the Fourth Doctor version of ''Shada'']] were [[T:VS|invalid sources]], and at [[Forum:Doctor_Who_Novelisations_-_canon_or_not%3F|Forum: Doctor Who Novelisations - canon or not?]] that novelisations are invalid if they contradict the television version. Therefore I am adding an invalid source tag.--[[Special:Contributions/104.32.214.184|104.32.214.184]]<sup>[[User talk:104.32.214.184#top|talk to me]]</sup> 23:36, November 29, 2014 (UTC) | |||
:Although, it could also be argued that this '''is''' valid, but with the Eighth Doctor, and... to [[Board:The Panopticon|the Panopticon]]!--[[User:JohnSmith5000100|JohnSmith5000100]] [[User talk:JohnSmith5000100|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:47, December 29, 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Clara Oswin Oswald arc == | |||
This is tagged with the Clara Oswin Oswald arc category and unless I missed it, I didn't see any mention of this on the page. Does one of Clara's echoes make an appearance in this novelisation or was this category accidentally applied? [[User:Mewiet|Mewiet]] [[User talk:Mewiet|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:11, February 28, 2015 (UTC) | |||
:Personally, I think that category is hugely misused. If the character of Clara didn't exist when a story was written, then in my opinion it '''can't''' be considered part of the arc. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:21, February 28, 2015 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 20:21, 28 February 2015
New series references[[edit source]]
I don't remember where Roberts uses the terms "fixed point in time" and "time lock". If anybody else does, please edit the reference section accordingly, to note the context in which those terms appear in this book. Thanks! —Josiah Rowe talk to me 05:37, June 11, 2012 (UTC)
- Found the time lock, but I'm still looking for the fixed point in time. —Josiah Rowe talk to me 04:34, June 13, 2012 (UTC)
Invalid source[[edit source]]
It was decided at Forum:Are deleted scenes canon? that deleted scenes, including the Fourth Doctor version of Shada were invalid sources, and at Forum: Doctor Who Novelisations - canon or not? that novelisations are invalid if they contradict the television version. Therefore I am adding an invalid source tag.--104.32.214.184talk to me 23:36, November 29, 2014 (UTC)
- Although, it could also be argued that this is valid, but with the Eighth Doctor, and... to the Panopticon!--JohnSmith5000100 ☎ 20:47, December 29, 2014 (UTC)
Clara Oswin Oswald arc[[edit source]]
This is tagged with the Clara Oswin Oswald arc category and unless I missed it, I didn't see any mention of this on the page. Does one of Clara's echoes make an appearance in this novelisation or was this category accidentally applied? Mewiet ☎ 20:11, February 28, 2015 (UTC)
- Personally, I think that category is hugely misused. If the character of Clara didn't exist when a story was written, then in my opinion it can't be considered part of the arc. Shambala108 ☎ 20:21, February 28, 2015 (UTC)
