Talk:Shada (novelisation)
New series references[[edit source]]
I don't remember where Roberts uses the terms "fixed point in time" and "time lock". If anybody else does, please edit the reference section accordingly, to note the context in which those terms appear in this book. Thanks! —Josiah Rowe talk to me 05:37, June 11, 2012 (UTC)
- Found the time lock, but I'm still looking for the fixed point in time. —Josiah Rowe talk to me 04:34, June 13, 2012 (UTC)
Invalid source[[edit source]]
It was decided at Forum:Are deleted scenes canon? that deleted scenes, including the Fourth Doctor version of Shada were invalid sources, and at Forum: Doctor Who Novelisations - canon or not? that novelisations are invalid if they contradict the television version. Therefore I am adding an invalid source tag.--104.32.214.184talk to me 23:36, November 29, 2014 (UTC)
- Although, it could also be argued that this is valid, but with the Eighth Doctor, and... to the Panopticon!--JohnSmith5000100 ☎ 20:47, December 29, 2014 (UTC)
Clara Oswin Oswald arc[[edit source]]
This is tagged with the Clara Oswin Oswald arc category and unless I missed it, I didn't see any mention of this on the page. Does one of Clara's echoes make an appearance in this novelisation or was this category accidentally applied? Mewiet ☎ 20:11, February 28, 2015 (UTC)
- Personally, I think that category is hugely misused. If the character of Clara didn't exist when a story was written, then in my opinion it can't be considered part of the arc. Shambala108 ☎ 20:21, February 28, 2015 (UTC)
