Talk:Rachel McMahon: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
When looking in the script from house of Blue Fire provided by Big Finish, the surname of Rachel is McMahon is there any way the name of the page can be changed. [[User: TimeDude]] | When looking in the script from house of Blue Fire provided by Big Finish, the surname of Rachel is McMahon is there any way the name of the page can be changed. [[User: TimeDude]] | ||
:Added a {{tlx|rename}} tag for ya. :)<br>--[[user:SmallerOnTheOutside|SOTO]] [[User talk:SmallerOnTheOutside|☎]] 17:10, August 3, 2013 (UTC) | :Added a {{tlx|rename}} tag for ya. :)<br>--[[user:SmallerOnTheOutside|SOTO]] [[User talk:SmallerOnTheOutside|☎]] 17:10, August 3, 2013 (UTC) | ||
Thanks for that my subscription didn't include this release. '''[[User:AdricLovesNyssa|AdricLovesNyssa]]''' 19:09, August 3, 2013 (UTC) | |||
::Hmm, this was moved while I was writing this message. But I was going to ask why we're preferring a name that requires going to a secondary source, anyway? Why is this page not at simply [[No. 5]]? {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}} 19:16: Sat 03 Aug 2013</span> | |||
:::Because when I listened to the story the characters No 5, No 12, No 16 and No 18 are referred to as Rachel McMahon, Toby Dodds, Jerome Fisher and Sally Morgon respectively from about the middle of part 2 and therefore spend more than 50% of the story being referred by the Doctor and other characters as the proper names rahter than the designations given during their amnesiac state. '''[[User:AdricLovesNyssa|AdricLovesNyssa]]''' 19:46, August 3, 2013 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 19:46, 3 August 2013
Incorrect Surname[[edit source]]
When looking in the script from house of Blue Fire provided by Big Finish, the surname of Rachel is McMahon is there any way the name of the page can be changed. User: TimeDude
Thanks for that my subscription didn't include this release. AdricLovesNyssa 19:09, August 3, 2013 (UTC)
- Hmm, this was moved while I was writing this message. But I was going to ask why we're preferring a name that requires going to a secondary source, anyway? Why is this page not at simply No. 5?
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ 19:16: Sat 03 Aug 2013- Because when I listened to the story the characters No 5, No 12, No 16 and No 18 are referred to as Rachel McMahon, Toby Dodds, Jerome Fisher and Sally Morgon respectively from about the middle of part 2 and therefore spend more than 50% of the story being referred by the Doctor and other characters as the proper names rahter than the designations given during their amnesiac state. AdricLovesNyssa 19:46, August 3, 2013 (UTC)
- Hmm, this was moved while I was writing this message. But I was going to ask why we're preferring a name that requires going to a secondary source, anyway? Why is this page not at simply No. 5?