Talk:The Companions: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(→Notable Features: new section) |
m (CzechBot moved page Talk:Doctor Who: The Companions to Talk:The Companions: slashing 'Doctor Who:' or 'Doctor Who -' from title per Thread:117218 and forum:Doctor Who prefix in titles) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Publisher's Summary says "Thirty companions are mentioned" but I only count 29. | Publisher's Summary says "Thirty companions are mentioned" but I only count 29. | ||
[[User:Americanwhofan|Americanwhofan]] 18:48, 31 August 2009 (UTC) | [[User:Americanwhofan|Americanwhofan]] 18:48, 31 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
:Now that I checked the list I'm almost sure Victoria Waterfield is the missing one. | |||
[[User:Americanwhofan|Americanwhofan]] 16:45, September 3, 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Notable Features == | == Notable Features == | ||
quoting the Publisher's Summary "Thirty companions are mentioned, and fifteen are discussed in some depth" so the list of companions should probably be split in two. | quoting the Publisher's Summary "Thirty companions are mentioned, and fifteen are discussed in some depth" so the list of companions should probably be split in two. | ||
Latest revision as of 22:46, 17 December 2012
companion missing in list under Notable Features?[[edit source]]
Publisher's Summary says "Thirty companions are mentioned" but I only count 29. Americanwhofan 18:48, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- Now that I checked the list I'm almost sure Victoria Waterfield is the missing one.
Americanwhofan 16:45, September 3, 2009 (UTC)
Notable Features[[edit source]]
quoting the Publisher's Summary "Thirty companions are mentioned, and fifteen are discussed in some depth" so the list of companions should probably be split in two.
