Talk:Grass: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Shambala108 (talk | contribs) (→Why) Tag: sourceedit |
Shambala108 (talk | contribs) (per Tardis:Vandalism you cannot edit other users' discussion or talk page comments. Undo revision 2882561 by NightmareofEden (talk)) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
::Oh, and [[Thread:127413]], while dealing mostly with the issue of [[Tardis:Redlinks]], also indirectly discusses the issue in question. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 03:33, September 11, 2017 (UTC) | ::Oh, and [[Thread:127413]], while dealing mostly with the issue of [[Tardis:Redlinks]], also indirectly discusses the issue in question. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 03:33, September 11, 2017 (UTC) | ||
::And I know your comments were meant to be sarcastic, but we already have articles at [[oxygen]], [[carbon dioxide]] and [[nitrogen]]. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 03:49, September 11, 2017 (UTC) | ::And I know your comments were meant to be sarcastic, but we already have articles at [[oxygen]], [[carbon dioxide]] and [[nitrogen]]. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 03:49, September 11, 2017 (UTC) | ||
:::What the fuck? Lol. {{raw:w:papi}} 07:49, September 11, 2017 (UTC) | |||
For what it's worth, it was established at [[Talk:Howling_Halls/Archive 1]] and [[Tardis:We're Wikipedia's evil twin]] that any noun can have an article. To quote from the policy page: | |||
:"We believe that any noun mentioned in any narrative is fair game for an article here. Thus we have many articles which are about genuine Doctor Who minutiae. Since our inception, we've consistently proclaimed that no subject is "too small" for an article." | |||
[[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 01:25, September 24, 2017 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 01:50, 24 April 2020
Why[[edit source]]
Do we really need an article about grass?
Why don’t we make an article about air too? Hell, while we’re at it, let’s make articles about oxygen, carbon dioxide, argon, and nitrogen as well.
Hell, we might as well create an article about water. Oh wait, it already exists.
Is this Wikipedia or the Doctor Who wiki? {{raw:w:papi}} 22:47, September 10, 2017 (UTC)
- See Tardis:We're Wikipedia's evil twin, the third box from the top. 108.17.143.251talk to me 00:33, September 11, 2017 (UTC)
- Oh, and Thread:127413, while dealing mostly with the issue of Tardis:Redlinks, also indirectly discusses the issue in question. Shambala108 ☎ 03:33, September 11, 2017 (UTC)
- And I know your comments were meant to be sarcastic, but we already have articles at oxygen, carbon dioxide and nitrogen. Shambala108 ☎ 03:49, September 11, 2017 (UTC)
- What the fuck? Lol. {{raw:w:papi}} 07:49, September 11, 2017 (UTC)
For what it's worth, it was established at Talk:Howling_Halls/Archive 1 and Tardis:We're Wikipedia's evil twin that any noun can have an article. To quote from the policy page:
- "We believe that any noun mentioned in any narrative is fair game for an article here. Thus we have many articles which are about genuine Doctor Who minutiae. Since our inception, we've consistently proclaimed that no subject is "too small" for an article."
Shambala108 ☎ 01:25, September 24, 2017 (UTC)
