Talk:Campaign (unreleased novel): Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
NateBumber (talk | contribs) (minor fixes) |
m (Pluto2 moved page Talk:Campaign (novel) to Talk:Campaign (unreleased novel): Dabbing policy) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Unlocking request == | == Unlocking request == | ||
In June 2017, [[User:CzechOut]] deleted and locked [[Campaign (novel)]], saying that it should never be recreated. It's absolutely true that no page should be created for the fan-published novel; however, I think it wouldn't be at all out-of-line to create a page for the ''original pitch'', with [[:Template:Unprod]] template and in [[:Category:Unproduced Doctor Who novels]], analogous to pages we have for other rejected stories like ''[[The Krikkitmen (TV story)|The Krikkitmen]]'', ''[[The Castle of Doom (TV story)|The Castle of Doom]]'', ''[[The Brain-Dead (TV story)|Doctor Who and the Brain-Dead]]'', ''[[The Killing Stone (novel)|The Killing Stone]]'', etc. Would that be in violation of the rules? – [[User:NateBumber|N8]] [[User_talk:NateBumber|☎]] 14:21, June 5, 2018 (UTC) | In June 2017, [[User:CzechOut]] deleted and locked [[Campaign (novel)]], saying that it should never be recreated. It's absolutely true that no page should be created for the fan-published novel; however, I think it wouldn't be at all out-of-line to create a page for the ''original pitch'', with [[:Template:Unprod]] template and in [[:Category:Unproduced Doctor Who novels]], analogous to pages we have for other rejected stories like ''[[The Krikkitmen (TV story)|The Krikkitmen]]'', ''[[The Castle of Doom (TV story)|The Castle of Doom]]'', ''[[The Brain-Dead (TV story)|Doctor Who and the Brain-Dead]]'', ''[[The Killing Stone (novel)|The Killing Stone]]'', etc. Would that be in violation of the rules? – [[User:NateBumber|N8]] [[User_talk:NateBumber|☎]] 14:21, June 5, 2018 (UTC) | ||
:Nah, this makes sense as far as I can see. I mean, ''[[The Killing Stone (novel)|The Killing Stone]]'', in particular, was created after there was a whole thread in the old Forums that established we ''didn't'' cover the unlicensed released version, which eems like pretty close precedent. An {{tlx|unprod}} story is an {{tlx|unprod}} story. Might as well delete ''[[The Masters of Luxor (TV story)|The Masters of Luxor]]'' because there was a famous fanfilm "remake" of it. [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 17:47, 16 February 2021 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 23:22, 17 March 2023
Unlocking request[[edit source]]
In June 2017, User:CzechOut deleted and locked Campaign (novel), saying that it should never be recreated. It's absolutely true that no page should be created for the fan-published novel; however, I think it wouldn't be at all out-of-line to create a page for the original pitch, with Template:Unprod template and in Category:Unproduced Doctor Who novels, analogous to pages we have for other rejected stories like The Krikkitmen, The Castle of Doom, Doctor Who and the Brain-Dead, The Killing Stone, etc. Would that be in violation of the rules? – N8 ☎ 14:21, June 5, 2018 (UTC)
- Nah, this makes sense as far as I can see. I mean, The Killing Stone, in particular, was created after there was a whole thread in the old Forums that established we didn't cover the unlicensed released version, which eems like pretty close precedent. An {{unprod}} story is an {{unprod}} story. Might as well delete The Masters of Luxor because there was a famous fanfilm "remake" of it. Scrooge MacDuck ☎ 17:47, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
