Talk:Meta-Crisis Doctor: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m (Scrooge MacDuck moved page Talk:Tenth Doctor (Journey's End) to Talk:Meta-Crisis Doctor) |
|||
| (194 intermediate revisions by 23 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ArchCat}} | {{ArchCat}} | ||
== A day to come? == | |||
Do we really need this section here, given that this is NOT an actual incarnation of the Doctor? I think this is based on a misunderstanding of the [[Eleventh Doctor]]'s whole "vanity issues" statement in ''[[The Time of the Doctor (TV story)|The Time of the Doctor]]'', which actually places the "Twelfth Incarnation" as the Doctor who appears from [[Journey's End (TV story)|''Journey's End'']] to ''[[The End of Time (TV story)|The End of Time]]'', not this guy. Which, thinking about, shouldn't that also necessitate a splitting of our [[Tenth Doctor]] page? [[User:NightmareofEden|NightmareofEden]] [[User talk:NightmareofEden|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 14:49, 25 December 2021 (UTC) | |||
: | :: There's little to no point splitting the Tenth Doctor's page, as he essenial regenerated back into himself. He even affirms as much in ''Journey's End'': ''"Used the regeneration energy to heal myself, but soon as I was done, I didn't need to change. I didn't want to. Why would I? Look at me. So, to stop the energy going all the way, I siphoned off the rest into a handy bio-matching receptacle, namely my hand. "'' & ''"I'm still me."'' Then, in ''The Time of the Doctor'', the Eleventh Doctor reiterates with; ''"Number Ten once regenerated and kept the same face."'' So, what would have been the tenth regeneration (at the time) was instead used in conjunction with [[the Tenth Doctor's hand]] to create the "Meta-Crisis Doctor", thus justifying the "A day to come" subsection covering mentions of future regenerations. BananaClownMan 04:30, 26 December 2021 (UTC) | ||
::: I agree with Nightmare of Eden, the page's current format makes no sense. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]][[User Talk:OttselSpy25|🤙☎️]] 00:17, 15 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
::::I both miss arguing with Eden, and agree with her. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 00:45, 15 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:23, 25 March 2023
A day to come?[[edit source]]
Do we really need this section here, given that this is NOT an actual incarnation of the Doctor? I think this is based on a misunderstanding of the Eleventh Doctor's whole "vanity issues" statement in The Time of the Doctor, which actually places the "Twelfth Incarnation" as the Doctor who appears from Journey's End to The End of Time, not this guy. Which, thinking about, shouldn't that also necessitate a splitting of our Tenth Doctor page? NightmareofEden ☎ 14:49, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- There's little to no point splitting the Tenth Doctor's page, as he essenial regenerated back into himself. He even affirms as much in Journey's End: "Used the regeneration energy to heal myself, but soon as I was done, I didn't need to change. I didn't want to. Why would I? Look at me. So, to stop the energy going all the way, I siphoned off the rest into a handy bio-matching receptacle, namely my hand. " & "I'm still me." Then, in The Time of the Doctor, the Eleventh Doctor reiterates with; "Number Ten once regenerated and kept the same face." So, what would have been the tenth regeneration (at the time) was instead used in conjunction with the Tenth Doctor's hand to create the "Meta-Crisis Doctor", thus justifying the "A day to come" subsection covering mentions of future regenerations. BananaClownMan 04:30, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
