|
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
| (147 intermediate revisions by 44 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{ArchCat}} | | {{ArchiveList}} |
|
| |
|
| == Re: Talk page == | | == Vandalism == |
| Ah, it wasn't that it didn't work - I simply hadn't completed the process. I had to go offline to do something, leaving this half done. Thanks for the advice though, it's appreciated. [[User:Epsilon the Eternal|<span style="color:gold"><tt>'''Epsilon'''</tt></span>]] ([[User talk:Epsilon the Eternal|''<tt>Contact me</tt>'']]) 00:25, October 17, 2020 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
|
| == Speedy rename == | | The vandal has returned - https://tardis.fandom.com/wiki/Sent_a_death_threat_to_a_12-year-old_Hungarian_boy [[User:DJAitch|DJAitch]] [[User talk:DJAitch|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 12:04, 8 July 2023 (UTC) |
| | :Thought we had a spam filter rule for this now. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 13:01, 8 July 2023 (UTC) |
| | ::We do, but it is not sufficient to catch these pages. [[User:Bongolium500|<span title="aka Bongolium500">Bongo50</span>]] [[User talk:Bongolium500|<span title="talk to me">☎</span>]] 13:30, 8 July 2023 (UTC) |
| | ::: To clarify further, the filter is only set up to detect pages of the form "n-year-old girl from ____", [https://tardis.fandom.com/wiki/Special:AbuseLog?wpSearchFilter=18 which it has been succesfully doing]. Catching the others currently being created would be far harder as there is less of a patern to their page name. [[User:Bongolium500|<span title="aka Bongolium500">Bongo50</span>]] [[User talk:Bongolium500|<span title="talk to me">☎</span>]] 13:40, 8 July 2023 (UTC) |
|
| |
|
| Could you do me a favor and move [[The Wintertime Paradox: Festive stories from the World of Doctor Who]] to [[The Wintertime Paradox (anthology)]] real quick? I'll do the busywork and tidy up all the links once you do, it's just really bugging me :') – [[User:NateBumber|<span title="User:NateBumber">N8</span>]] ([[User_talk:NateBumber|<span title="Leave me a note">☎</span>]]/[[Special:Contributions/NateBumber|<span title="Spy on my edits">👁️</span>]]) 19:01, October 17, 2020 (UTC)
| | == Admin+ == |
|
| |
|
| == Vandalism/Block == | | Hey there! I’m reaching out to introduce the Admin+ program (if you haven’t heard about it already!) & let you know I’m here if you have any questions about it. Take a look at the details [https://community.fandom.com/wiki/Admin_Plus here] & feel free to send over any questions you have. <span style="font-family: Rubik; border-radius:8em; padding:0 5px; background:#d58494">[[User:Pikushi|<span style="color:#f1f5ff">pikushi ✧.*</span>]] </span> <staff /> 20:25, 18 September 2023 (UTC) |
|
| |
|
| [[User:AuntyAntt]] and 178.62.118.65 could use a block when you have the time, and [[Natalie Robyn]] should probably be protected. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:34, October 21, 2020 (UTC)
| | == Help Understanding rules == |
| :Also [[User:SAGARBEST]] [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:39, October 21, 2020 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
|
| == The Crimes of Thomas Brewster Editing and Errors ==
| | Hey I was wondering if it is allowed for me to move my user page to a different link, then back so get the redrect. Also is it allowed to post here? |
|
| |
|
| Hey Oncoming, hope you're well. I was originally going to write this on [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108's]] talk page but they seem to be busy and since you're more of an [[AUDIO]] expert I thought I would consult you. I listened to [[The Crimes of Thomas Brewster (audio story)|The Crimes of Thomas Brewster]] today and was about the add the plot when I started reading the page entry and realised that there are a lot of errors and a LOT of misinformation. I can see from the history page that you, [[User:Danochy|Danochy]] and Shambala have been adding a bit to it over the past little while but some stuff needs to be corrected. For example, there's a link to a page for <nowiki>[[Literatos II]]</nowiki>. I listened very carefully to that joke/sarcasm the Doctor tells DI Menzies and the planet is actually called '''Literalis II''' (it's hard to catch at first but Colin Baker definitely pronounces it with an 'L'), I guess it's supposed to be a joke on the word "literal". The problem is that, as I just linked, a whole page has already been made for it. So my first question is, how do I deal with incorrect pages like that? I know I'm not supposed to delete them, am I supposed to inform a moderator to delete it or something? Also, I may need someone to go over the page once I'm done editing tomorrow, not just to clean up my mistakes but also, because I haven't listened to a lot of Sixth Doctor audios, there are a LOT of continuity references and such that went over my head. I tried to note whatever I could, but I was just hoping that, if I add the bare text that I wrote down for it, someone could make a note to go through and expand whatever I mention? For example, DI Menzies in the story talks a lot about already having met the Doctor in another adventure but I don't know what adventure that was and I think I missed a lot of the references to that adventure.
| | The redrect would be Betacoder125 |
|
| |
|
| Thank you again and I'm sorry I hope I'm not coming across as rude. I was just a bit surprised by the discovery, that's all, but we all have bad days or forget things. Cheers! [[User:DoctorQuoi|DoctorQuoi]] [[User talk:DoctorQuoi|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 05:34, October 24, 2020 (UTC)DoctorQuoi
| | --BetaCoder |
| | |
| :Hey Oncoming, got your message! Thank you so much for that incredibly instructive breakdown. Also, I'm really glad I didn't come across as rude or snarky, I was just honestly concerned about the page. I imagine a lot of users read these summaries to get a better idea of whether the audio is worth purchasing. I've certainly consulted a page or two before buying, as they can get pretty expensive haha! I also apologize, I know I said I'd update [[AUDIO]]: ''[[The Crimes of Thomas Brewster (audio story)|The Crimes of Thomas Brewster]]'' but as always real-life got in the way, so I'll try do it today or at the very latest by end of next week.
| |
| | |
| :Before I get back to you with changes regarding that story, I did also want to bring your attention to another audio. [[AUDIO]]: ''[[Invaders from Mars (audio story)|Invaders from Mars]]'' has a page linked to it called ''[[Time Lord (Invaders from Mars)]]''. I finished editing the page yesterday, adding part 4 of the plot and updating all the relevant Cont./Note/Disc. sections. I noticed that the person who linked it actually didn't catch the reference properly, the "reference" was actually a "Continuity", and was a reference to the story [[TV]]: ''[[The Time Meddler (TV story)|The Time Meddler]]'' and the "amoral Time Lord" was actually [[The Monk|the Monk]]. So I suspect the page ''[[Time Lord (Invaders from Mars)]]'' needs to be deleted, because this page really just refers to [[The Monk|the Monk]]. Just thought I would let you know!! Will be in touch soon regarding Crimes of Brewster! Otherwise, happy Halloween for next week (if you celebrate)! [[User:DoctorQuoi|DoctorQuoi]] [[User talk:DoctorQuoi|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 18:52, October 25, 2020 (UTC)DoctorQuoi
| |
| | |
| ::Hey! Firstly, I'm so sorry for getting back to you so late, funny you should mention taking my time for doing the summaries, as I'm afraid this week has become exceedingly busy, so I'm afraid that's going to be exactly the case haha. Nonetheless, thank you for the kind reply as always and for going easy on a newbie like myself! So, firstly, with regards to [[Time Lord (Invaders from Mars)]], I actually didn't realise the vagueness in the story, so my apologies, that's on me. I forgot to mark the time-stamp where it was mentioned, and I, unfortunately, don't have much time to go back and listen to it again (although it's an amusing story haha, but I always enjoy Mark Gatiss episodes!) so I'm afraid I can't quite jog your memory. Do we happen to have a script for this story? It would just be an easy "ctrl"+"f"+"amoral Time Lord" and confirm or deny our suspicion. I am so sorry, I'm usually more diligent than this, I guess I just heard [[11th century]] and [[Time Lord]] and my mind immediately latched onto [[TV]]: ''[[The Time Meddler (TV story)|The Time Meddler]]''. I guess for now we should just stand by the original edit and say that it's too anonymous to tell, but under continuity, as you suggested, make a mention that similar to that situation, the Doctor encountered an amoral Time Lord named [[The Monk|the Monk]] when he landed in the 11th Century in [[Northumbria]]? I'll leave the judgement call and updating the article in your more capable hands? I'm worried I've done enough damage as it stands haha.
| |
| | |
| ::Secondly, because I'm a bit occupied this week, I'll only be able to update [[The Crimes of Thomas Brewster (audio story)|The Crimes of Thomas Brewster]] part-by-part each day. I just wanted to let you know in case you wanted to go through the edits after I make them to ensure they're following proper wiki guidelines and there's no mistakes. It would just help a lot this one time because I'll use this as a guideline/learning experience to see how to edit the wiki's properly according to the standards you want to set for editing [[AUDIO]] pages in future. I'll start with part 2 right now actually. Hope you're doing well! Any Doctor Who-related Halloween plans? I'm going to be watching [[TV]]: ''[[The Curse of Fenric (TV story)|The Curse of Fenric]]'' for the first time on the new TV (it scared me too much as a teenager, so it's the perfect setting haha)! [[User:DoctorQuoi|DoctorQuoi]] [[User talk:DoctorQuoi|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 02:45, October 27, 2020 (UTC)DoctorQuoi
| |
| | |
| == RE: Serious harassment from admin Scrooge MacDuck ==
| |
| | |
| Hello, I have no idea what to do but I believe I am the victim of serious harassment by fellow admin [[User:Scrooge MacDuck]].
| |
| | |
| I have posted a comment on [[User:Shambala108]]'s page, but wanted to consult at least two admins as I fear being immediately banned by Scrooge. [[User:DiSoRiEnTeD1|DiSoRiEnTeD1]] [[User talk:DiSoRiEnTeD1|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 17:23, October 28, 2020 (UTC)
| |
| :OS12th, I refer you to the message I left at Shambala's talk page (and to my message on DiSoRiEnTeD1's own talk page) for more context on his behaviour and the circumstances of his, I think you'll agree, well-warranted (and even rather lenient!) two-week block earlier this month.
| |
| | |
| :As I said there: as a show of good faith and in the hope that it will make DiSoRiEnTeD1 reconsider his bizarre conspiracy theories, I will ''not'' block DiSoRiEnTeD1 for this. Feel free to do so yourself if you think it right, however. It's up to you and other admins — or rather, ''it's up to Wiki polciy''. --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 17:29, October 28, 2020 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| :: You gained the status of an admin and went through several open discussions that you had been involved with and resolved them to your own satisfaction.
| |
| | |
| :: I did not attempt to disrupt the Wikia - had I attempted to do so I would have reopened said discussions. But no, I simply took my problem to an admin and questioned what had happened - you stated that this was me "reopening the discussion" and blocked me.
| |
| | |
| :: Since then I made a single edit, you accused me of disrupting the Wikia and have threatened to ban me by Sunday if you haven't received an apology. [[User:DiSoRiEnTeD1|DiSoRiEnTeD1]] [[User talk:DiSoRiEnTeD1|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 17:32, October 28, 2020 (UTC)
| |
| :::: DiSoRiEnTeD1, this is quite enough of you crowding out other people's talk pages with messages not addressed to them. Your (rather feeble) defence of your edits back in early October is something you should have brought to '''my''' talk page, on Community Central, weeks ago. This is what [[Help:I'm blocked]] is ''for'', and I pointed you to it in my blocking rationale back then.
| |
| | |
| :::: If you have anything more to say to ''me'', please take it to ''my'' talk page. For the third time, I will not block you if you do this. In fact I have publicly pledged not to block you ''anyway'', and to leave the matter of your discipline for your actions today to other admins. But please '''communicate'''. --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 17:36, October 28, 2020 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == RE:Admin behaviour ==
| |
| The story had already been ruled invalid so Scrooge was unable to overrule this decision. The new thread was regarding the story’s coverage as a whole - which he ruled entirely in his favour.
| |
| | |
| I did not create another thread about the story’s validity. I asked an admin to review the decision by a new admin as I believed that they were unfair as he had been involved in the discussions and as a result was not neutral (I did not know that this was not against the rules). Which I still think should be the case - had I been promoted as an admin I could have simply done the exact same thing in my favour, which isn’t fair.
| |
| | |
| And I did NOT violate [[T:POINT]] regarding River Song. I made the initial change and someone took issue with that, therefore the change that should have remained was mine - as that was that state of the page when the discussion was raised. The page has since had River as Human / Porto-Time Lord for months now until a user recently changed it. I simply changed it back to the state of the page when the discussion was raised, and now received the outrageous threat of a ban.
| |
| | |
| He only said that he wouldn’t ban me when I called him out on the harassment. Before that he demanded I apologise to him before Sunday or he ban me! [[User:DiSoRiEnTeD1|DiSoRiEnTeD1]] [[User talk:DiSoRiEnTeD1|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:35, October 28, 2020 (UTC)
| |
| :To be fair to DiS, their placement of human in the infobox was simply reverting an edit [[User:BananaClownMan]] took during the time after our discussion stalled out as no consensus has been reached. (BCM not being one of the participants and ostensibly not knowing that it existed) I reverted the edit effectively on instinct given the change + reasoning given, and had it stated "[[T:BOUND]] violation" I likely wouldn't have.
| |
| :I note that I'm quite confident the current policy would actually be to have her listed as ''not'' being a human as well, due to the edit history presented at [[Talk:River Song]] - given BCM made to her infobox species and it stood for quite some time before DiS made his own change and immediately caused controversy, but that's not how we've been treating it throughout our discussion. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:51, October 28, 2020 (UTC)
| |
| :: Yeah, just to clarify something quickly: my issue with DiSoRiEnTeD1's [[River Song]] edit was not so much the edit itself (which is a bit of a can of worms as described above) as that, in the edit summary, DiSoRiEnTeD1 justified himself by making claims about the status of '''consensus''' on the talk page. Regular users''' aren't supposed to decide when there's consensus''', or make edits based on that. There may have been valid reasons to do the same edit that DiSoRiEnTeD1 performed! But he was clearly doing it for the wrong reasons. --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:56, October 28, 2020 (UTC)
| |
| ----
| |
| | |
| : I was not doing it for the "wrong reasons".
| |
| | |
| : There was an edit war on River Song's page months ago, [[User:Shambala108]] stepped in and made a decision that "Human" was to be on the page until a consensus was reached in the open discussion. This can be seen in Shambala's reversal of [[User:Najawin]]'s removal of "Human" from the page (which nobody changed for over three months until the edit that I took issue with). There has not been a consensus reached, and I know that because there hasn't been an admin ruling - so this user was, knowingly or not, reverting an edit which an admin had put in place to prevent edit warring.
| |
| | |
| : To get threatened with a ban for this is utter lunacy. [[User:DiSoRiEnTeD1|DiSoRiEnTeD1]] [[User talk:DiSoRiEnTeD1|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:02, October 28, 2020 (UTC)
| |
| ::: …''Also'' to be clear, my “threatened” ban (which was actually more of “I ''should'', if I were throwing the book at you, block right now, but I'm giving you a way to wriggle out of it” ban) wasn't ''just'' based on DiSoRiEnTeD1's edit rationale at [[River Song]]. It was, in my mind, of apiece with his flagrant breach of the code of conduct laid out at [[Help:I'm blocked]] — facts dating back several weeks, but which had only just become known to me. I should have thought that was obvious, given the amount of my original talk page message which is devoted to ''that''. Sorry if it wasn't. --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:06, October 28, 2020 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| :::::Telling someone that you will block them if they haven't apologised to you by a specific date is blackmail, threatening and purely disgusting. Something I have never seen an admin on any Wikia do. I will not speak to you privately and I will not be forced to.
| |
| | |
| ::::: This is my final reply to anyone other than Oncoming. [[User:DiSoRiEnTeD1|DiSoRiEnTeD1]] [[User talk:DiSoRiEnTeD1|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:11, October 28, 2020 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| While some may think that I am going on a bit, it really is frustrating to be accused of violating [[T:POINT]] by two admins when I truly have done no such thing.
| |
| | |
| Here's a breakdown of what actually happened;
| |
| | |
| On '''May 27, 2020''' I added "Human" to River Song's template. For some context, ''Proto-Time Lord'' has never been stated in-universe to strictly be a human-descended species and therefore I believe that human should be specified in River's infobox. This change was initially reverted by [[User:BananaClownMan]], and I reverted it back. Then [[User:Snivystorm]] reverted my edit and I made an additional edit to include my change. This would have been my final edit before opening a discussion, to avoid edit warring. While no subsequent changes were made to the page during that period, a lengthily discussion was held on my talk page between myself, Snivystorm and [[User:SarahJaneFan]], where it was agreed that we would all have to listen to the audio stories again before we were able to say with certainty that Proto-Time Lords were a human descended species, therefore human was left on the page for the time being.
| |
| | |
| No further change had still been made by '''July 9, 2020''' when [[User:Najawin]] opened a discussion titled "Human vs Proto-Time Lord" on River's talk page. The discussion received no interaction and on '''June 12, 2020''' Najawin changed River's to remove "human". Presumably to avoid edit warring, although I can't speak for anybody else, [[User:Shambala108]] stepped in to reverse the change made by Najawin to my version which included "human". Throughout July Najawin's discussion received significant traction but once again fizzled out into nothing.
| |
| | |
| Then on '''25 September, 2020''' BananaClown once again removed "human" from River's infobox. As Shambala had stepped in to reverse a similar edit months previously, and since then there had been no alternative ruling by an admin, I reversed the edit citing "no concensus has been reached" only for my edit to be reversed by Najawin (who, going by the chain of events and that their change had already been reversed by an admin, was actually the one violating [[T:POINT]]).
| |
| | |
| Yet it was me who was accused of "stirring up trouble" and "claiming spurious admin authority", and I simply refuse to believe that this wasn't a result of a vendetta against me seeing as it was a totally acceptable edit and the first one I had done in nearly a month! [[User:DiSoRiEnTeD1|DiSoRiEnTeD1]] [[User talk:DiSoRiEnTeD1|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:43, October 28, 2020 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| : I'm sorry but this is completely unacceptable. You have just admitted that my change to River Song's page today - which I will be immediately making once again - was acceptable. Yet you refuse to condemn an admin that decided to send me an aggressive message about me attempting to "stir up trouble", etc, because of this '''correct''' change. It boggles the mind.
| |
| | |
| : Likewise, there was absolutely no reason for me to be threatened with a ban if I did not apologise for an earlier "offence" - which I have already severed the time for. Regarding that offence it is absolutely ridiculous too, I have been through [[T:POINT]] and at no point does it say that you cannot ask an admin to review another admin's changes - especially that of a rookie admin who has possessed the privleges for a couple of days. [[User:DiSoRiEnTeD1|DiSoRiEnTeD1]] [[User talk:DiSoRiEnTeD1|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:53, October 28, 2020 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == The Master template ==
| |
| | |
| Hi how are you? I noticed that you recently archived the latest posts in the Master's talk page, but in doing so, you also archived the templates at the top. I just wanted to check to see if this was intentional or not, as the template info seems like something that should always be on the talk page rather than hidden away in the archives. [[User:LauraBatham|LauraBatham]] [[User talk:LauraBatham|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 23:55, November 5, 2020 (UTC)
| |
