Talk:Restoration of the Daleks: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Created page with 'Why is it assumed that the daleks escaped from the 2009 invasion? The references to these daleks not being pure suggest that they come from 200100~~~~')
 
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Why is it assumed that the daleks escaped from the 2009 invasion? The references to these daleks not being pure suggest that they come from 200100Icecreamdif 17:39, May 2, 2010 (UTC)
Why is it assumed that the daleks escaped from the 2009 invasion? The references to these daleks not being pure suggest that they come from 200,100. Icecreamdif 17:39, May 2, 2010 (UTC)
 
 
 
I put a space and a full stop in there for ya. But I agree with your point. [[User:Fan555|Fan555]] 17:49, May 2, 2010 (UTC)
 
==Merger / Delete==
[[User:Blue Rook]] added a proposed deletion tag stating:
:"This should simply be a section in the [[New Dalek Paradigm]] article, since it describes their origins"
 
I've changed it to a merge tag as this page dates to [http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Restoration_of_the_Daleks?action=history 18 April 2010] whilst [[New Dalek Paradigm]] dates to [http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/New_Dalek_Paradigm?limit=500&action=history 7 August 2011]. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 15:21, June 8, 2013 (UTC)
: So the article [[New Dalek Paradigm]] would remain and this would become a redirect, right? [[User:Blue Rook|Blue Rook]] [[User talk:Blue Rook|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 17:29, June 9, 2013 (UTC)
 
::Sort of.
::Merging the articles means that the two page's histories become one. At the end of it this will become a redirect / all the links that direct here will be changed to point to the New Dalek Paradigm article. As I've linked to above both these articles have long history pages so merging preserves this page's history. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 17:59, June 9, 2013 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 17:59, 9 June 2013

Why is it assumed that the daleks escaped from the 2009 invasion? The references to these daleks not being pure suggest that they come from 200,100. Icecreamdif 17:39, May 2, 2010 (UTC)


I put a space and a full stop in there for ya. But I agree with your point. Fan555 17:49, May 2, 2010 (UTC)

Merger / Delete[[edit source]]

User:Blue Rook added a proposed deletion tag stating:

"This should simply be a section in the New Dalek Paradigm article, since it describes their origins"

I've changed it to a merge tag as this page dates to 18 April 2010 whilst New Dalek Paradigm dates to 7 August 2011. --Tangerineduel / talk 15:21, June 8, 2013 (UTC)

So the article New Dalek Paradigm would remain and this would become a redirect, right? Blue Rook 17:29, June 9, 2013 (UTC)
Sort of.
Merging the articles means that the two page's histories become one. At the end of it this will become a redirect / all the links that direct here will be changed to point to the New Dalek Paradigm article. As I've linked to above both these articles have long history pages so merging preserves this page's history. --Tangerineduel / talk 17:59, June 9, 2013 (UTC)