User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Reference Desk/@comment-43874324-20200828130153: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO | Forum Archive | The Reference Desk
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\5\2/\4-\3, -'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-(.*?)'''([\s\S]*) ?\{\{retitle\|///(.*?)\}\} +{{retitle|\2/\5}}\n'''User:\1/\2/@comment-\3'''\4)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{retitle|The Reference Desk/Dimensions in Time validity (see also; beating a dead horse)}} | |||
I’ve more or less accepted by this point that this site is never going to accept ''Dimensions in Time'' as a valid source, but whenever I ask about why that is, I’m usually told “look through the debate thread”. | I’ve more or less accepted by this point that this site is never going to accept ''Dimensions in Time'' as a valid source, but whenever I ask about why that is, I’m usually told “look through the debate thread”. | ||
Rather than being directed to that long thread of text walls again...could I just have a simple, bullet-pointed list of the main reasons? | Rather than being directed to that long thread of text walls again...could I just have a simple, bullet-pointed list of the main reasons? | ||
I’m aware of least two of them, both with which I personally disagree (“EastEnders has been established as a fictional work within the DWU” and “the scene in 2013 contradicts EastEnders’ own canon”). What are the other reasons? | I’m aware of least two of them, both with which I personally disagree (“EastEnders has been established as a fictional work within the DWU” and “the scene in 2013 contradicts EastEnders’ own canon”). What are the other reasons? | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Reference Desk/20200828130153-43874324]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 00:38, 28 April 2023
I’ve more or less accepted by this point that this site is never going to accept Dimensions in Time as a valid source, but whenever I ask about why that is, I’m usually told “look through the debate thread”.
Rather than being directed to that long thread of text walls again...could I just have a simple, bullet-pointed list of the main reasons?
I’m aware of least two of them, both with which I personally disagree (“EastEnders has been established as a fictional work within the DWU” and “the scene in 2013 contradicts EastEnders’ own canon”). What are the other reasons?
