User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Reference Desk/@comment-43908-20140609224946: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\5\2/\4-\3, -'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-(.*?)'''([\s\S]*) ?\{\{retitle\|///(.*?)\}\} +{{retitle|\2/\5}}\n'''User:\1/\2/@comment-\3'''\4))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Reference Desk/@comment-43908-20140609224946'''
{{retitle|The Reference Desk/Unit 190 in Gallifrey: Forever}}
The Gallifrey audio ''[[Forever (audio story)|Forever]]'' features Unit 190, aka [[Sura]], who appears to be the counterpart to [[Susan Foreman]] on that story's alternate Gallifrey.  However, it's been a while since I've listened to it; how obvious is the Susan connection made in the story?  Is there anything which gets in the way of it being an obvious enough connection to note in Susan and Sura's articles, and the ''Forever'' article? {{retitle|///Unit 190 in Gallifrey: Forever}}
The Gallifrey audio ''[[Forever (audio story)|Forever]]'' features Unit 190, aka [[Sura]], who appears to be the counterpart to [[Susan Foreman]] on that story's alternate Gallifrey.  However, it's been a while since I've listened to it; how obvious is the Susan connection made in the story?  Is there anything which gets in the way of it being an obvious enough connection to note in Susan and Sura's articles, and the ''Forever'' article?  
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Reference Desk/20140609224946-43908]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 00:38, 28 April 2023

The Gallifrey audio Forever features Unit 190, aka Sura, who appears to be the counterpart to Susan Foreman on that story's alternate Gallifrey. However, it's been a while since I've listened to it; how obvious is the Susan connection made in the story? Is there anything which gets in the way of it being an obvious enough connection to note in Susan and Sura's articles, and the Forever article?