Talk:Shrek (franchise): Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Created page with "== I'm not 100% sure this counts == While it's true that the ''It{{'}}s Showtime'' campaign as a whole did have the license to use Shrek (as evidenced by that one channel ID in which he physically appears), I don't know if it counts as being utilised here, since his appearance is only implied from off screen. It's not like, say, ''The Princess and the Frog'', where it being mentioned throughout is topped off by the brief physical appearance of Naveen at the end. ~~~~") |
m (WaltK moved page Talk:Shrek (series) to Talk:Shrek (franchise): We should probably still have a discussion on what dabs we should go with, but Shrek definitely falls under "franchise" status in my mind.) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== I'm not 100% sure this counts == | == I'm not 100% sure this counts == | ||
While it's true that the ''It{{'}}s Showtime'' campaign as a whole did have the license to use Shrek (as evidenced by that one channel ID in which he physically appears), I don't know if it counts as being utilised here, since his appearance is only implied from off screen. It's not like, say, ''The Princess and the Frog'', where | While it's true that the ''It{{'}}s Showtime'' campaign as a whole did have the license to use Shrek (as evidenced by that one channel ID in which he physically appears), I don't know if it counts as being utilised here, since his appearance is only implied from off screen. It's not like, say, ''The Princess and the Frog'', where the crossover doesn't become truly official until Naveen's physical cameo at the end. [[User:WaltK|WaltK]] [[User talk:WaltK|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 18:48, 7 May 2023 (UTC) | ||
: I mean, you hear him, so it's confirmed that he's there, even if not physically seen, and he's explicitly identified as [[Shrek (character)|Shrek]]. [[User:Cookieboy 2005|Cookieboy 2005]] [[User talk:Cookieboy 2005|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 14:22, 30 June 2023 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:18, 4 November 2023
I'm not 100% sure this counts[[edit source]]
While it's true that the It's Showtime campaign as a whole did have the license to use Shrek (as evidenced by that one channel ID in which he physically appears), I don't know if it counts as being utilised here, since his appearance is only implied from off screen. It's not like, say, The Princess and the Frog, where the crossover doesn't become truly official until Naveen's physical cameo at the end. WaltK ☎ 18:48, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
- I mean, you hear him, so it's confirmed that he's there, even if not physically seen, and he's explicitly identified as Shrek. Cookieboy 2005 ☎ 14:22, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
