More actions
m (Reverted edits by Danochy (talk) to last revision by Thalek Prime Overseer) Tags: Rollback Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Possible deletion? == | == Possible deletion? == | ||
I think a case could be made for this page being deleted. The majority of the appearances are of the Dalek Time Strategist individual, and only about 4 stories actually features the Dalek Time Strategists as a Dalek sub-species. Therefore, most of this page's info is shared with [[Dalek Time Strategist (The Shadow Vortex)/Appearances]]. Is it really worth having this info copied twice over across two separate appearance lists? And if not, is there much point in having an appearance page that only lists 4 appearances? [[User:Thalek Prime Overseer|Thalek Prime Overseer]] [[User talk:Thalek Prime Overseer|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 11:16, 12 May 2023 (UTC) | I think a case could be made for this page being deleted. The majority of the appearances are of the Dalek Time Strategist individual, and only about 4 stories actually features the Dalek Time Strategists as a Dalek sub-species. Therefore, most of this page's info is shared with [[Dalek Time Strategist (The Shadow Vortex)/Appearances]]. Is it really worth having this info copied twice over across two separate appearance lists? And if not, is there much point in having an appearance page that only lists 4 appearances? [[User:Thalek Prime Overseer|Thalek Prime Overseer]] [[User talk:Thalek Prime Overseer|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 11:16, 12 May 2023 (UTC) | ||
: I think it's useful to represent the appearances of this type in some manner, because even if only (I think it's) 2 appearances don't involve that particular individual, they all are of this type. I do agree that the current way of doing things could be improved, however. Perhaps a more informative way would be to actually show which appearances don't involve the the Time War strategist. Whether that involves separating the two into separate tables (like [[Rassilon/Appearances]] or simply linking to [[Dalek Time Strategist (The Shadow Vortex)/Appearances]] (like at [[The Doctor/Appearances]] and then listing just the two ''Dark Eyes'' appearances, I'm not sure. [[User:Danochy|Danochy]] [[User talk:Danochy|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:13, 14 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
::I see what you mean, and I think the second option would work particularly well. A link to [[Dalek Time Strategist (The Shadow Vortex)/Appearances]], as well as an accompanying sentence briefly explaining why those appearances aren't listed here, would be the best solution here. [[User:Thalek Prime Overseer|Thalek Prime Overseer]] [[User talk:Thalek Prime Overseer|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 13:14, 15 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 13:14, 15 May 2023
Possible deletion?[[edit source]]
I think a case could be made for this page being deleted. The majority of the appearances are of the Dalek Time Strategist individual, and only about 4 stories actually features the Dalek Time Strategists as a Dalek sub-species. Therefore, most of this page's info is shared with Dalek Time Strategist (The Shadow Vortex)/Appearances. Is it really worth having this info copied twice over across two separate appearance lists? And if not, is there much point in having an appearance page that only lists 4 appearances? Thalek Prime Overseer ☎ 11:16, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
- I think it's useful to represent the appearances of this type in some manner, because even if only (I think it's) 2 appearances don't involve that particular individual, they all are of this type. I do agree that the current way of doing things could be improved, however. Perhaps a more informative way would be to actually show which appearances don't involve the the Time War strategist. Whether that involves separating the two into separate tables (like Rassilon/Appearances or simply linking to Dalek Time Strategist (The Shadow Vortex)/Appearances (like at The Doctor/Appearances and then listing just the two Dark Eyes appearances, I'm not sure. Danochy ☎ 22:13, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- I see what you mean, and I think the second option would work particularly well. A link to Dalek Time Strategist (The Shadow Vortex)/Appearances, as well as an accompanying sentence briefly explaining why those appearances aren't listed here, would be the best solution here. Thalek Prime Overseer ☎ 13:14, 15 May 2023 (UTC)