(Created page with "{{Forumheader|The Old Workshops}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> Would a template that marks a story as currently being at the centre of a validity debate being viable? ~~~~") |
Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Forumheader|The Old Workshops}} | {{Forumheader|The Old Workshops}} | ||
== Introduction == | |||
Would a template that marks a story as currently being at the centre of a validity debate being viable? [[User:WaltK|WaltK]] [[User talk:WaltK|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:26, 11 August 2023 (UTC) | Would a template that marks a story as currently being at the centre of a validity debate being viable? [[User:WaltK|WaltK]] [[User talk:WaltK|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:26, 11 August 2023 (UTC) | ||
== Discussion == | |||
I suppose so? {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 20:40, 11 August 2023 (UTC) | |||
:I'd love this - potentially we could still use the current template images, but just change the text and the link to go to the relevent thread (or talk page). Or we could create a new template image called "validity under discussion" or smth. [[User:Cousin Ettolrhc|Cousin Ettolrahc]] [[User talk:Cousin Ettolrhc|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:26, 12 August 2023 (UTC) | |||
::Viable, sure? I don't see the necessity. I think the number of users who care about our byzantine validity policies and don't also pay attention to our forums is a rather small set. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:40, 12 August 2023 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 21:40, 12 August 2023
Index → The Old Workshops → Idea: Ongoing validity debate template
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
Introduction[[edit source]]
Would a template that marks a story as currently being at the centre of a validity debate being viable? WaltK ☎ 20:26, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
Discussion[[edit source]]
I suppose so?
20:40, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- I'd love this - potentially we could still use the current template images, but just change the text and the link to go to the relevent thread (or talk page). Or we could create a new template image called "validity under discussion" or smth. Cousin Ettolrahc ☎ 21:26, 12 August 2023 (UTC)