Talk:Disney+ (in-universe): Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary
Tag: 2017 source edit
m (Template order: P2/3)
 
(17 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Subpage tabs}}
{{subpage tabs}}
 
== Existence warranted? ==
== Existence warranted? ==
I ''really'' don't think this page should exist, nor should any potential pages on any of the other platforms advertised on that cover. I can guarantee that if we didn't have access to the actual real world cover, we wouldn't even have known the Disney+ logo was even there. [[User:WaltK|WaltK]] [[User talk:WaltK|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I ''really'' don't think this page should exist, nor should any potential pages on any of the other platforms advertised on that cover. I can guarantee that if we didn't have access to the actual real world cover, we wouldn't have known the logo was even there. [[User:WaltK|WaltK]] [[User talk:WaltK|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)


: I mean, the logo is visible on the cover. It's very ''minor'', but I do think there's enough evidence to show that the networks exist in-universe. [[User:Cookieboy 2005|Cookieboy 2005]] [[User talk:Cookieboy 2005|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
: I mean, the logo is visible on the cover. It's very ''minor'', but I do think there's enough evidence to show that the networks exist in-universe. [[User:Cookieboy 2005|Cookieboy 2005]] [[User talk:Cookieboy 2005|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
:: I can kinda-sorta make out a dark-bluish rectangle with a white smudge. Again, we only know what it's meant to represent because we have the actual cover for reference. [[User:WaltK|WaltK]] [[User talk:WaltK|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
::: I disagree. ''The Star Beast'' was filmed in 4K, so the details will be present in that version, it's just that the screengrab being currently used is more than likely from iPlayer and therefore is heavily compressed. The BBC seem to be incapable of releasing scenes in anything higher than 1080p for... some reason. {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 21:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
:::: CookieBoy, could you give me an approximate timestamp of where the shot comes from please? [[User:WaltK|WaltK]] [[User talk:WaltK|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
::::: I believe it's around 24 minutes into the episode. [[User:Cookieboy 2005|Cookieboy 2005]] [[User talk:Cookieboy 2005|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:01, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
:::::: Well, I'm none the wiser from looking at the iPlayer version. Can the episode be viewed in 4K anywhere? The Disney+ version, perhaps? [[User:WaltK|WaltK]] [[User talk:WaltK|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:04, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Can't make it out on Disney+ on my computer. I'll have access to a rather large television in the next week or two that I can try it on. But not until then. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:17, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
: I am trying to locate a 4K version for general screenshots, for the record. It's painful the compression that iPlayer implements. {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 22:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
:: The Disney+ version has ''slightly'' better quality, I guess, but still not really enough to be able to see anything on the magazine. [[User:WaltK|WaltK]] [[User talk:WaltK|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:29, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
:::Yeah, tried on the large TV. No dice. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 03:55, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Can we get a verdict on this yet? [[User:WaltK|WaltK]] [[User talk:WaltK|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 15:58, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
::::I'm going to err on this being deleted.
::::If we didn't know what those logos were, if they were for fictional or future-based services would we have made pages for them, based on this magazine with the information we have available to us? --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 00:56, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 02:27, 13 March 2024

Existence warranted?[[edit source]]

I really don't think this page should exist, nor should any potential pages on any of the other platforms advertised on that cover. I can guarantee that if we didn't have access to the actual real world cover, we wouldn't have known the logo was even there. WaltK 21:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

I mean, the logo is visible on the cover. It's very minor, but I do think there's enough evidence to show that the networks exist in-universe. Cookieboy 2005 21:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I can kinda-sorta make out a dark-bluish rectangle with a white smudge. Again, we only know what it's meant to represent because we have the actual cover for reference. WaltK 21:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I disagree. The Star Beast was filmed in 4K, so the details will be present in that version, it's just that the screengrab being currently used is more than likely from iPlayer and therefore is heavily compressed. The BBC seem to be incapable of releasing scenes in anything higher than 1080p for... some reason. 21:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
CookieBoy, could you give me an approximate timestamp of where the shot comes from please? WaltK 21:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I believe it's around 24 minutes into the episode. Cookieboy 2005 22:01, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Well, I'm none the wiser from looking at the iPlayer version. Can the episode be viewed in 4K anywhere? The Disney+ version, perhaps? WaltK 22:04, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Can't make it out on Disney+ on my computer. I'll have access to a rather large television in the next week or two that I can try it on. But not until then. Najawin 22:17, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

I am trying to locate a 4K version for general screenshots, for the record. It's painful the compression that iPlayer implements. 22:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The Disney+ version has slightly better quality, I guess, but still not really enough to be able to see anything on the magazine. WaltK 20:29, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Yeah, tried on the large TV. No dice. Najawin 03:55, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Can we get a verdict on this yet? WaltK 15:58, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

I'm going to err on this being deleted.
If we didn't know what those logos were, if they were for fictional or future-based services would we have made pages for them, based on this magazine with the information we have available to us? --Tangerineduel / talk 00:56, 10 February 2024 (UTC)