|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{ArchCat}} | | {{ArchCat}} |
|
| |
| == Know or known? ==
| |
|
| |
| So I put in the little quote from ''[[The Doctor's Wife]]'' that tells us the first words the Doctor said to the TARDIS. It's a pretty important deal so I think it makes sense to highlight it with {{tl|quote}}. But I'm hearing {{quote|the most beautiful thing I'd ever know|TDW}} a future-tense ''prediction'' that makes sense for a Time Lord. However, I seem to be mishearing things, because the article's been changed to {{quote|the most beautiful thing I'd ever known|TDW}} which is decidedly past tense, and sort of the tense that our human ears ''want'' to hear. I really don't hear Matt Smith pronouncing that closing "n". And frankly, given the importance of verb tense to the script, it seems more logical to me that Gaiman would have used "know" instead of "known". Can some other ears listen for me and report what they hear? I think we want to get this quote exactly right. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}'''22:24:50 Mon '''16 May 2011 </span>
| |
| *Just listened again, and it sounds pretty clear to be "known", not "know". [[User:Witoki|Witoki]] 01:08, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| == Sexy ==
| |
|
| |
| So uh... the Doctor did kind of outright name the TARDIS "Sexy". Should we note this somewhere near the top or in the infobox? [[User:Witoki|Witoki]] 23:32, May 18, 2011 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| :At this point, I think we should be taking it as a gag. So I think it definitely doesn't belong in the lead as one of the alternate names of the craft. If it creeps into ''several'' later scripts, then we ''might'' bump it up to the lead, in the same way that the First Doctor's usual season 1 name of "the Ship" is. But, sure, the gag could be noted somewhere else in the article. I definitely think it would be a mistake, though, to create a redirect from [[sexy]] to [[the Doctor's TARDIS]]. Way too premature for that. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}'''01:26:22 Sat '''21 May 2011 </span>
| |
| :: In my opinion, it's officially her name, because far from it being simply a gag, she's named Sexy 4 times: 1. She suggests it as a name when asked by the Doctor; 2. The Doctor agrees to call her Sexy; 3. She later asks "is that my name?" when the Doctor calls her "You sexy thing" and he replies "you bet it's your name; 4. She ''self-identifies'' using the name Sexy when introduced to Amy and Rory. I really don't know how much more criteria is needed for naming someone. ''Having said that'' I'm not in favor of renaming this article "Sexy", since "Doctor's TARDIS" is still the more widely used term. However, adding an aka to the infobox and indicating that she adopted - if informally - the name "Sexy" during her time as a human, is in order. I'd also support the addition of an actor credit for Suranne Jones and an image of a post-TARDIS Idris to the article - certainly the latter should be added, even if the actor credit isn't supported. It's just as appropriate as showing a closeup of the key. [[Special:Contributions/68.146.71.145|68.146.71.145]] 06:01, June 22, 2011 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| == Altering Environment ==
| |
|
| |
| "The TARDIS could alter the environment within its rooms and even fast-forward time within itself (or at least create the illusion of time passing). (DW: The Doctor's Wife)"
| |
|
| |
| I'm of the opinion that these experiences were illusions, likely created by Nephew under House's guidance, and not an ability of the TARDIS itself. In a couple cases, Amy and Rory were in the same spot, and only Amy saw the changes, such as a lack of light or a dead, angry Rory.
| |
|
| |
| ==The Doctor's TARDIS - Alt universe==
| |
| The Doctor looses his TARDIS in [[NA]]: ''[[Blood Heat]]'' and doesn't regain his original TARDIS until ''[[Happy Endings]]'', for the stories during this period he's travelling in the Third Doctor from the alternate universe's TARDIS. It's essentially the same TARDIS except for the working chameleon circuit until ''[[No Future]]''. Should it have a separate page or be part of this one? And if a separate page, just [[The Doctor's TARDIS (Blood Heat)]]? Or some other disambiguation title specifying its alternate universe standing? --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 15:24, September 26, 2011 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| == "Multiple Control Rooms" == | | == "Multiple Control Rooms" == |
|
| |
|
| If I remember correctly, in the episode which House took over the TARDIS, the embodiment of the TARDIS' heart, that female that held that energy, said that she was directing Rory and Amy to one of the alternate control rooms in the TARDIS, mentioning she had archived all of the control rooms, including the ones from future iterations of the Doctor. Therefore, do we really need an "additional citation needed" on the line in the wiki stating that there may have been more than one control room? Or am I misinterpreting that line? --[[Special:Contributions/164.156.200.105|164.156.200.105]]<sup>[[User talk:164.156.200.105#top|talk to me]]</sup> 18:21, July 26, 2012 (UTC) | | If I remember correctly, in the episode which House took over the TARDIS, the embodiment of the TARDIS' heart, that female that held that energy, said that she was directing Rory and Amy to one of the alternate control rooms in the TARDIS, mentioning she had archived all of the control rooms, including the ones from future iterations of the Doctor. Therefore, do we really need an "additional citation needed" on the line in the wiki stating that there may have been more than one control room? Or am I misinterpreting that line? --[[Special:Contributions/164.156.200.105|164.156.200.105]]<sup>[[User talk:164.156.200.105#top|talk to me]]</sup> 18:21, July 26, 2012 (UTC) |
"Multiple Control Rooms"
If I remember correctly, in the episode which House took over the TARDIS, the embodiment of the TARDIS' heart, that female that held that energy, said that she was directing Rory and Amy to one of the alternate control rooms in the TARDIS, mentioning she had archived all of the control rooms, including the ones from future iterations of the Doctor. Therefore, do we really need an "additional citation needed" on the line in the wiki stating that there may have been more than one control room? Or am I misinterpreting that line? --164.156.200.105talk to me 18:21, July 26, 2012 (UTC)
