User talk:Tangerineduel: Difference between revisions
Shambala108 (talk | contribs) |
m (→Orphaned pages: apology) |
||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
Hi! I have a couple of questions about orphaned pages. How many links need to go to an orphaned page for it to be no longer considered orphaned, that is, is one enough? And do I need to remove the orphan tag from the page and remove the page name from the [[Special:Lonelypages]] page? Thanks! [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:24, October 24, 2012 (UTC) | Hi! I have a couple of questions about orphaned pages. How many links need to go to an orphaned page for it to be no longer considered orphaned, that is, is one enough? And do I need to remove the orphan tag from the page and remove the page name from the [[Special:Lonelypages]] page? Thanks! [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:24, October 24, 2012 (UTC) | ||
:Thanks! I've only done a handful so far, so I'll remove the tag from them and get to work on some more. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 13:36, October 25, 2012 (UTC) | :Thanks! I've only done a handful so far, so I'll remove the tag from them and get to work on some more. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 13:36, October 25, 2012 (UTC) | ||
==Unintentional Oops== | |||
Sorry about the talk page fix. I was just browsing and somehow forgot I wasn't on a formal page anymore. It won't happen again. [[User:JustLittleOlMe|<font color="blue">Jay JLOM</font>]]<sup>[[User Talk:JustLittleOlMe|<font color="Red">Things turn out for the best for the people who make the best of the way things turn out - John Wooden</font>]]</sup> 01:36, October 27, 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:36, 27 October 2012
Zoom
Thanks for the pics. All I can do is share them with Wikia. It's nothing I'm doing in CSS.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ 14:41: Thu 04 Oct 2012
- I assume this is in Firefox, though? I'm not seeing the same results in Safari or Chrome. Firefox has never reacted very well to zooming on the edit box — though its problems heretofore have been with zooming out more than in.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ 14:45: Thu 04 Oct 2012- Yep, you did say Firefox. Sorry. The thing about this new design is that the editing window has a fluid height. Firefox is apparently not liking that fluidity as much as other browsers. I will say, however, that on pages that have a lot of text, it's not quite so noticeable.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ 15:02: Thu 04 Oct 2012
- Yep, you did say Firefox. Sorry. The thing about this new design is that the editing window has a fluid height. Firefox is apparently not liking that fluidity as much as other browsers. I will say, however, that on pages that have a lot of text, it's not quite so noticeable.
DWTV Eleven pic
Hi! I already asked CzechOut about this, but seeing as he's "checked out" for the past few days, I was hoping another mod could help me out. I noticed that the DWTV template's Eleven pic is getting to be too small for how many episodes Eleven has now and was wondering if you could replace it with this: [[1]] Memnarc ☎ 10:17, October 17, 2012 (UTC)
Theme
I know. I just made a joke. 139.55.12.139talk to me 11:03, October 17, 2012 (UTC)
Back soon
Sorry for being away for a couple of weeks. I'll be away for a couple more weeks. I've decided that I can't just stand by in the current election, and am therefore using my free time to support the candidates of my choice. Hope you don't mind holding down the fort for a bit.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ 17:37: Wed 24 Oct 2012
Update question
I posted a question over at the Panopticon (Forum:Wantedpages), but didn't get any responses. Might you know where better to ask the question, or mayhaps you might know? Thank you muchly. ----Ebyabe (talk) 19:01, October 24, 2012 (UTC)
New fixed width
Just to let you know that the 'floating' article templates are misaligned thanks to the now-slightly wider Oasis skin. I'd fix it myself, but it's a CSS thing. ǝsʞpɐןǝ (talk page) 20:13, 24 October 2012
Orphaned pages
Hi! I have a couple of questions about orphaned pages. How many links need to go to an orphaned page for it to be no longer considered orphaned, that is, is one enough? And do I need to remove the orphan tag from the page and remove the page name from the Special:Lonelypages page? Thanks! Shambala108 ☎ 22:24, October 24, 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks! I've only done a handful so far, so I'll remove the tag from them and get to work on some more. Shambala108 ☎ 13:36, October 25, 2012 (UTC)
Unintentional Oops
Sorry about the talk page fix. I was just browsing and somehow forgot I wasn't on a formal page anymore. It won't happen again. Jay JLOMThings turn out for the best for the people who make the best of the way things turn out - John Wooden 01:36, October 27, 2012 (UTC)