Talk:Redacted (audio series): Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit 2017 source edit |
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:Well, at the time it seemed appropriate given that was all we had to represent them. But now that there’s more, morally we shouldn’t be covering that specific image given that it would be unfair to use one representation over another. It does, however mean that we can’t have a visual representation of them because none is given in the official media itself. However, there’s no actual policy on this subject. ——[[User:Danniesen|Danniesen]] [[User talk:Danniesen|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 16:27, 20 June 2022 (UTC) | :Well, at the time it seemed appropriate given that was all we had to represent them. But now that there’s more, morally we shouldn’t be covering that specific image given that it would be unfair to use one representation over another. It does, however mean that we can’t have a visual representation of them because none is given in the official media itself. However, there’s no actual policy on this subject. ——[[User:Danniesen|Danniesen]] [[User talk:Danniesen|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 16:27, 20 June 2022 (UTC) | ||
:: It is still the first. Should still be notable enough. And we could link to a gallery page with other works the Doctor Who Twitter account has reposted, to illustrate that this is just the earliest example (maybe a gallery for #FanArtFriday, which seems to be their big thing?).{{User:SOTO/sig}} 04:55, 21 June 2022 (UTC) | :: It is still the first. Should still be notable enough. And we could link to a gallery page with other works the Doctor Who Twitter account has reposted, to illustrate that this is just the earliest example (maybe a gallery for #FanArtFriday, which seems to be their big thing?).{{User:SOTO/sig}} 04:55, 21 June 2022 (UTC) | ||
::: Alternatively, a limited gallery on the ''Redacted'' page itself could work.{{User:SOTO/sig}} 04:56, 21 June 2022 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:56, 21 June 2022
Character images
So, the images currently used on character pages (although only in #Behind the scenes sections) are from a piece of fanart that was, at the time, the only officially recognised visual representation of the characters. Recently, however, the official Doctor Who Twitter account reposted 4 more pieces of fanart, and I'm curious what this means for the illustration of the characters.
Above is a gallery of the pieces of fanart reposted by the official Doctor Who Twitter account, for illustrative purposes. Cookieboy 2005 ☎ 14:07, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- Well, at the time it seemed appropriate given that was all we had to represent them. But now that there’s more, morally we shouldn’t be covering that specific image given that it would be unfair to use one representation over another. It does, however mean that we can’t have a visual representation of them because none is given in the official media itself. However, there’s no actual policy on this subject. ——Danniesen ☎ 16:27, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- It is still the first. Should still be notable enough. And we could link to a gallery page with other works the Doctor Who Twitter account has reposted, to illustrate that this is just the earliest example (maybe a gallery for #FanArtFriday, which seems to be their big thing?).
× SOTO (☎/✍/↯) 04:55, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- It is still the first. Should still be notable enough. And we could link to a gallery page with other works the Doctor Who Twitter account has reposted, to illustrate that this is just the earliest example (maybe a gallery for #FanArtFriday, which seems to be their big thing?).
