User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-31010985-20190928203157/@comment-31010985-20191016003623: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="quote"> | <div class="quote"> | ||
Amorkuz wrote: | Amorkuz wrote: | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
You noted yourself in the deleted thread that at least two of the license-holders Arcbeatle claimed to get permissions from loaned their concepts to Wylder for his stories. In addition, one of those people vouched that they had also gotten the necessary permissions from everyone. Is this enough evidence for the existence of a commercial license or would it be more preferable for the exact words "commercial license" to be used? | You noted yourself in the deleted thread that at least two of the license-holders Arcbeatle claimed to get permissions from loaned their concepts to Wylder for his stories. In addition, one of those people vouched that they had also gotten the necessary permissions from everyone. Is this enough evidence for the existence of a commercial license or would it be more preferable for the exact words "commercial license" to be used? | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20190928203157-31010985/20191016003623-31010985]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:30, 27 April 2023
Amorkuz wrote: It has been stated by the OP, "A commercial licence is definitely involved from the evidence that has been presented." Unfortunately, I see no evidence to support the existence of commercial license.
You noted yourself in the deleted thread that at least two of the license-holders Arcbeatle claimed to get permissions from loaned their concepts to Wylder for his stories. In addition, one of those people vouched that they had also gotten the necessary permissions from everyone. Is this enough evidence for the existence of a commercial license or would it be more preferable for the exact words "commercial license" to be used?
