User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-31010985-20190928203157/@comment-31010985-20191016003623
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Amorkuz wrote: It has been stated by the OP, "A commercial licence is definitely involved from the evidence that has been presented." Unfortunately, I see no evidence to support the existence of commercial license.
You noted yourself in the deleted thread that at least two of the license-holders Arcbeatle claimed to get permissions from loaned their concepts to Wylder for his stories. In addition, one of those people vouched that they had also gotten the necessary permissions from everyone. Is this enough evidence for the existence of a commercial license or would it be more preferable for the exact words "commercial license" to be used?
