Forum:Coverage: Inside Family Guy/"Doctor Who Farted": Difference between revisions
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
== Discussion == | == Discussion == | ||
Yeah, if there's no evidence it's licensed there probably shouldn't be a page for it - its acknowledgement may be ''just'' enough for an overview as a "[[:Category:Real world series with DWU connections|connected series]]", but no more than that (the current pages being made redirects to it). (Also, I feel like if it ''is'' licensed, it'll be difficult to split from the full episode considering the way it's framed.) [[User:Cookieboy 2005|Cookieboy 2005]] [[User talk:Cookieboy 2005|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:34, 2 August 2023 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:34, 2 August 2023
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
Introduction
Argh, this freakin' story. This supposedly official Family Guy crossover is, to put it lightly, causing its fair share of headaches. When we're not arguing what to even call the thing, we're debating over whether our coverage should extend beyond the skit itself to cover the setup, thus making Lois, Meg, Chris, Stewie and Brian official characters (which, in that context, they absolutely should, as I've argued). But before all that, we should talk about whether this scene is even eligible for coverage here to begin with.
This page's existence has led to the creation of a number of peripheral pages (actors like Rachael MacFarlane, studios like Fuzzy Door Productions, TV channels like ITV2, and, of course, the series itself), and it all hinges on an unsourced claim that the BBC gave their permission to the Tenth Doctor and the TARDIS's use.
The closest we have to any sort of acknowledgement by the BBC is that the skit's original reveal at San Diego Comic-Con 2016 was the subject of a news article on the official Doctor Who website.
On Family Guy's end, there is no acknowledgement of the BBC in Inside Family Guy's ending credits. Two other potential sources I've suggested looking up are the episode's DVD commentary (assuming it has one), and the official publication Inside Family Guy: An Illustrated History. WaltK ☎ 19:32, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
Discussion
Yeah, if there's no evidence it's licensed there probably shouldn't be a page for it - its acknowledgement may be just enough for an overview as a "connected series", but no more than that (the current pages being made redirects to it). (Also, I feel like if it is licensed, it'll be difficult to split from the full episode considering the way it's framed.) Cookieboy 2005 ☎ 22:34, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
