Forum:Validity: The Airzone Solution: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Created page with "{{Forumheader|Inclusion debates}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> Now that my validity proposal has concluded has concluded, I have another BBV Rule 4 by proxy case that I would like to discuss. This one deals with ''The Airzone Solution'', which I think could have a case for R4bp because the Airzone Corporation is mentioned in Jay Eale...")
Tag: 2017 source edit
 
No edit summary
Tag: 2017 source edit
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Forumheader|Inclusion debates}}
{{Forumheader|Inclusion debates}}
<!-- Please put your content under this line.  Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ -->
<!-- Please put your content under this line.  Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ -->
Now that [[Forum:Validity: Do You Have a Licence to Save this Planet?|my validity proposal has concluded]] has concluded, I have another BBV Rule 4 by proxy case that I would like to discuss. This one deals with ''The Airzone Solution'', which I think could have a case for R4bp because the [[Airzone Corporation]] is mentioned in [[Jay Eales (in-universe)|Jay Eales]]' subsection of ''[[Burning with Optimism's Flames (anthology)|Burning with Optimism's Flames]]''' [[Contributors  (short story)|Contributors]] section, which is treated as a valid source by this wiki. Now, I'm aware that the original Airzone Solution film isn't covered on this wiki do to having no official connection to the DWU, however, [[The Airzone Solution (novelisation)|the novelization of it]] is due to containing officially licensed references to DWU elements. I think it would make sense to validate the novelization of ''TAZ'' by R4bp because of this reference. [[User:Cgl1999|Cgl1999]] [[User talk:Cgl1999|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 05:44, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
Now that [[Forum:Validity: Do You Have a Licence to Save this Planet?|my validity proposal has concluded]] has concluded, I have another BBV Rule 4 by proxy case that I would like to discuss. This one deals with ''The Airzone Solution'', which I think could have a case for R4bp because the [[Airzone Corporation]] is mentioned in [[Jay Eales (in-universe)|Jay Eales]]' subsection of ''[[Burning with Optimism's Flames (anthology)|Burning with Optimism's Flames]]''' [[Contributors  (short story)|Contributors]] section, which is treated as a valid source by this wiki. Now, I'm aware that the original Airzone Solution film isn't covered on this wiki do to having no official connection to the DWU, however, [[The Airzone Solution (novelisation)|the novelization of it]] is, albeit as an invalid source, due to containing officially licensed references to DWU elements. I think it would make sense to validate the novelization of ''TAZ'' by R4bp because of this reference. [[User:Cgl1999|Cgl1999]] [[User talk:Cgl1999|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 05:44, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:52, 6 August 2023

IndexInclusion debates → Validity: The Airzone Solution
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.

Now that my validity proposal has concluded has concluded, I have another BBV Rule 4 by proxy case that I would like to discuss. This one deals with The Airzone Solution, which I think could have a case for R4bp because the Airzone Corporation is mentioned in Jay Eales' subsection of Burning with Optimism's Flames' Contributors section, which is treated as a valid source by this wiki. Now, I'm aware that the original Airzone Solution film isn't covered on this wiki do to having no official connection to the DWU, however, the novelization of it is, albeit as an invalid source, due to containing officially licensed references to DWU elements. I think it would make sense to validate the novelization of TAZ by R4bp because of this reference. Cgl1999 05:44, 6 August 2023 (UTC)