Forum:Layout: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
I cant see what we could put as an out of universe see also, as most articles on this wikia are in universe. [[User:Revanvolatrelundar|Revanvolatrelundar]] 20:32, January 5, 2011 (UTC) | I cant see what we could put as an out of universe see also, as most articles on this wikia are in universe. [[User:Revanvolatrelundar|Revanvolatrelundar]] 20:32, January 5, 2011 (UTC) | ||
Other episodes maybe?--[[User:Skittles the hog|Skittles the hog]]--<small>[[User talk:Skittles the hog|Talk]]</small> 20:37, January 5, 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:37, 5 January 2011
Index → Panopticon → Layout
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
The Manual of style says that See also follows Behind the scenes. Surely it should be before as it is in-universe.--Skittles the hog--Talk 20:21, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Actually, the layout doesn't say anything regarding 'see also'. --Bold Clone 20:25, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
- I agree that behind the scenes should be kept seperate as it is out of universe. Revanvolatrelundar 20:27, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
- We're not talking of merging them, though. We're arguing whether 'See also' comes before 'Behind the scenes' section or not. --Bold Clone 20:29, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
- What's the different between in-universe and out-universe 'See also'? --Bold Clone 20:30, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
I cant see what we could put as an out of universe see also, as most articles on this wikia are in universe. Revanvolatrelundar 20:32, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
Other episodes maybe?--Skittles the hog--Talk 20:37, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
