User talk:Bold Clone: Difference between revisions
Bold Clone (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
I made no changes, I reinstated the page in its original form. If you want to show your ideas, create a sandbox like most users have, here's a link [User:Bold Clone/Sandbox one]. Simply copy the article over and make your changes. This allows clear illustration and an easy comparison. Thanks----[[User:Skittles the hog|Skittles the hog]]--<small>[[User talk:Skittles the hog|Talk]]</small> 15:35, February 23, 2011 (UTC) | I made no changes, I reinstated the page in its original form. If you want to show your ideas, create a sandbox like most users have, here's a link [User:Bold Clone/Sandbox one]. Simply copy the article over and make your changes. This allows clear illustration and an easy comparison. Thanks----[[User:Skittles the hog|Skittles the hog]]--<small>[[User talk:Skittles the hog|Talk]]</small> 15:35, February 23, 2011 (UTC) | ||
:Sigh...and as usual, you completely ignored me. You know, if my method was in operation (discussion after edits), then none of this would be happening. The two of us would be calmly discussing my changes on the TP, and we could compare the revisions. Instead...you essentially shouted me down and banned me for vandalism. I don't see why you're so resistant to anyideas not your own. My idea allows for clear illustration and an easy comparison. Couldn't we just do that? Thanks. --[[User:Bold Clone|<span style="color:blue">'''Bold'''</span>]] [[User Talk:Bold Clone|<span style="color:gold">'''Clone'''</span>]] 15:40, February 23, 2011 (UTC) | :Sigh...and as usual, you completely ignored me. You know, if my method was in operation (discussion after edits), then none of this would be happening. The two of us would be calmly discussing my changes on the TP, and we could compare the revisions. Instead...you essentially shouted me down and banned me for vandalism. I don't see why you're so resistant to anyideas not your own. My idea allows for clear illustration and an easy comparison. Couldn't we just do that? Thanks. --[[User:Bold Clone|<span style="color:blue">'''Bold'''</span>]] [[User Talk:Bold Clone|<span style="color:gold">'''Clone'''</span>]] 15:40, February 23, 2011 (UTC) | ||
You have to switch between two comparisons in revision history. Shouted at you? I have only ever been polite in writing and blocking you wasn't out of anger. I think it safe to say that your current idea was not well accepted, [[the Doctor's TARDIS]] was improved by CzechOut additions, only for your good-self to remove them. This has been the case with many of you ''"additions"''. I think if you took a move friendly view, people would respect your opinion more. Thanks----[[User:Skittles the hog|Skittles the hog]]--<small>[[User talk:Skittles the hog|Talk]]</small> 15:45, February 23, 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:45, 23 February 2011
Thanks for your recent edits! I'm Jimbo, your robot wiki representative! We hope you'll keep on editing with us. This is actually a great time to have joined, because we're now fully independent, and working on a host of new features!
We've got a couple of important quirks for a fan written wiki, so let's get them out of the way first.
British English, please
We generally use British English 'round these parts, so if you use another form of English, please be sure you set your spell checker to BrEng, and take a gander at our spelling cheat card.
Spoilers aren't cool
We have a strict definition of "spoiler" that you may find a bit unusual. Basically, a spoiler, to us, is anything that comes from a story which has not been released yet. So, even if you've got some info from a BBC press release or official trailer, it basically can't be referenced here. In other words, you gotta wait until the episode has finished its premiere broadcast to start editing about its contents. Please check the spoiler policy for more details.
Other useful stuff
Aside from those two things, we also have some pages that you should probably read when you get a chance, like:
- the listing of all our help, policy and guideline pages
- our Manual of Style
- our image use policy
- our user page policy
If you're brand new to wiki editing — and we all were, once! — you probably want to check out these tutorials at Wikipedia, the world's largest wiki:
Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes like this:Thanks for becoming a member of the TARDIS crew! If you have any questions, see the Help pages, add a question to one of the Forums or ask an admin.
Edit warring
Please do not continue to edit war the headers of the Trickster's Brigade page. Allies can be contained with members as a different group.--Skittles the hog--Talk 21:52, February 4, 2011 (UTC)
Exactly why there is a different header with the central block of members. I suggest posting on the talk page as edit warring is against policy.--Skittles the hog--Talk 21:56, February 4, 2011 (UTC)
Blocking policy
You have not agreed to leave the page alone and discuss the matter on the talk page before changes are made, under the Tardis:blocking policy you can be blocked for around 2 hours if you continue to do this. Consider this your final warning. --Revan\Talk 22:06, February 4, 2011 (UTC)
You don't understand what I meant, you were reverting the edits back, they should have been left alone and then a TP discussion should occur. --Revan\Talk 22:09, February 4, 2011 (UTC)
- I agree with Bone Cold here, it seems a bit unfair that just because he did not go to the talk page, he should get blocked. Other Users were part of the edit war. However, now he done the right thing and started a discussion. Mini-mitch\talk 22:13, February 4, 2011 (UTC)
To be honest I have been looking at the big picture and not the specifics of this edit war. But in future try to leave the page after revertion and ask the users to discuss on the talk page. Thanks. --Revan\Talk 22:13, February 4, 2011 (UTC)
Your input is needed!
You are invited to join the discussion at Forum:comic strip, comic story, comic.
Policy
I think there should be a minimum, but I think it should be something you bring up in the forums. Also, I think that the 4 edits in 36 hours is too long. It should be 4 in 24 hours or something similar.Mini-mitch\talk 22:33, February 4, 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, and it was only removed by Czechout to stop an edit war. Mini-mitch\talk 22:34, February 4, 2011 (UTC)
Your input is needed!
You are invited to join the discussion at Forum:Renaming New Earth.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍
Pic removal at The Doctor's TARDIS
As the editor who put up the several pictures at The Doctor's TARDIS#Door which you removed, I'm curious why you clearly didn't want them there. Did you not think they helped illustrate the subject meaningfully? I'm genuinely curious why you didn't like those additions to the article.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍
- I didn't initially realise you couldn't answer this question because of a temporary block. I've now lifted the temporary ban on your being able to edit this page.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ - Thanks, Czech. This is why I voted against Skittles becoming a Sysop: I knew this would happen. He just doesn't have enough patience to handle the responsibility of being a Sysop. In regards to your question, I don't think the picutre "illustrated the subject meaningfully." Personally, I think you overdid it and placed too many images, additionally making a bunch of big ugly white gaps. I was trying to improve the page by taking out a couple of images removing the white spaces from the page. --Bold Clone 02:19, February 23, 2011 (UTC)
- Alright; I'll do that. How do I take a screen shot? --Bold Clone 15:23, February 23, 2011 (UTC)
Repeating actions
Please note, repeating actions does not make them correct and only creates edit wars. Talk pages are a good place to discuss individual pages. Thanks--Skittles the hog--Talk 23:15, February 22, 2011 (UTC)
- ...Right. This coming from the User who didn't go to a talk page and instead repeatedly reverted my edits instead of practicing what he preached. Hmm. Please note that repeating your actions did not make them correct and only helped create an edit war. Talk pages are a good place to discuss individual pages. Thanks. Next time, if you disagree with me, please just go to the talk page to discuss the matter, instead of ignoring my work and banning me for helping the wiki out. --Bold Clone 02:22, February 23, 2011 (UTC)
Changes should be discussed. The article as it stands should be what we revet to in these cases. As shown in all your edits, you have disregard for all users so I blocked you while repairing the page. Feel free to make a suggestion for changes on the talk page here: Talk:The Doctor's TARDIS. Thanks----Skittles the hog--Talk 15:26, February 23, 2011 (UTC)
- ...and your changes were not discussed. What's more, you gave no rational, did you? I did. I was clearing up white spaces and improving the page. What were you doing? Ah, that's right. Reverting my improvements and calling it "repairs". We're coming at this from different angles. You think that stuff should be disscussed before we edit pages. That's just a bunch of red tape that kills ideas. I think that changes should be discussed after the page is edited. That way, one can see the change and compare it to the original from the page archives. --Bold Clone 15:31, February 23, 2011 (UTC)
I made no changes, I reinstated the page in its original form. If you want to show your ideas, create a sandbox like most users have, here's a link [User:Bold Clone/Sandbox one]. Simply copy the article over and make your changes. This allows clear illustration and an easy comparison. Thanks----Skittles the hog--Talk 15:35, February 23, 2011 (UTC)
- Sigh...and as usual, you completely ignored me. You know, if my method was in operation (discussion after edits), then none of this would be happening. The two of us would be calmly discussing my changes on the TP, and we could compare the revisions. Instead...you essentially shouted me down and banned me for vandalism. I don't see why you're so resistant to anyideas not your own. My idea allows for clear illustration and an easy comparison. Couldn't we just do that? Thanks. --Bold Clone 15:40, February 23, 2011 (UTC)
You have to switch between two comparisons in revision history. Shouted at you? I have only ever been polite in writing and blocking you wasn't out of anger. I think it safe to say that your current idea was not well accepted, the Doctor's TARDIS was improved by CzechOut additions, only for your good-self to remove them. This has been the case with many of you "additions". I think if you took a move friendly view, people would respect your opinion more. Thanks----Skittles the hog--Talk 15:45, February 23, 2011 (UTC)