Forum:Short stories on the BBC website: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary
m (Robot: Automated text replacement (-[Ff]orum archives header +archive))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Forum archives header|Panopticon archives}}[[category:inclusion debates]]
{{archive|Panopticon archives}}[[category:inclusion debates]]
<!-- Please put your content under this line.  Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ -->
<!-- Please put your content under this line.  Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ -->



Latest revision as of 22:37, 6 May 2012

ForumsArchive indexPanopticon archives → Short stories on the BBC website
This thread has been archived.
Please create a new thread on the new forums if you want to talk about this topic some more.
Please DO NOT add to this discussion.

A new story has been released on the BBC Website here. Just to clarify:

  1. Are these considered canonical?
  2. And what prefix, if any, should be used for these short stories if citing them in articles?

~ Ghelæ -talk-contribs 17:46, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Hey, if The Frozen is canon, I don't see why this story wouldn't be. Might as well stick with the WC abbreviation. -<Azes13 20:45, 3 June 2008 (UTC)>-
Ah, I see. Thanks. ~ Ghelæ -talk-contribs 14:33, 4 June 2008 (UTC)