Talk:Auton: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(→‎Main image: new section)
(UTO)
Line 6: Line 6:
[[File:Autons-series-5.jpg|thumb|Nothing wrong with this image, is there?]]
[[File:Autons-series-5.jpg|thumb|Nothing wrong with this image, is there?]]
I think my image (Autons-series-5.jpg) should be the main image. It is the latest variant of the Autons. The previous is an old one from the '70s, and isn't that great. And also '''it is not Rory''', it's his Nestene duplicate. I don't see why my image shouldn't be up. [[User:Cortion|Cortion]] 19:17, June 30, 2011 (UTC)
I think my image (Autons-series-5.jpg) should be the main image. It is the latest variant of the Autons. The previous is an old one from the '70s, and isn't that great. And also '''it is not Rory''', it's his Nestene duplicate. I don't see why my image shouldn't be up. [[User:Cortion|Cortion]] 19:17, June 30, 2011 (UTC)
:Nope. It is known that Nestene duplicate is Rory. They are the same. So basically you want an image of Rory to be the article for Autons? The fact that it's the last variant of Autons is a lie. There are no variants of Autons they are all the same, new series or old series. The current one shows what an Auton is in general, without actually showing a specific type of Auton (i.e on the Master page we would not show on incarnation of the Master). The idea of the mian Auton article is to show Auton in general (as the current one does) and not to show specific type of Auton or Nestene duplicate, as we have articles for them. [[User:Mini-mitch|Mini-mitch]]\[[User talk:Mini-mitch|talk]] 19:24, June 30, 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:24, 30 June 2011

Different models of Autons

I suggest that, if no one has any reason why we shouldn't, we should sort the different models of Autons (plastic models, copies, etc.) and give them individual names like Auton-Clone, Auton-Sleeper and so forth. Suggestions for individuals names and models are appreciated. EltharionDrax 03:04, June 28, 2010 (UTC)

Main image

Nothing wrong with this image, is there?

I think my image (Autons-series-5.jpg) should be the main image. It is the latest variant of the Autons. The previous is an old one from the '70s, and isn't that great. And also it is not Rory, it's his Nestene duplicate. I don't see why my image shouldn't be up. Cortion 19:17, June 30, 2011 (UTC)

Nope. It is known that Nestene duplicate is Rory. They are the same. So basically you want an image of Rory to be the article for Autons? The fact that it's the last variant of Autons is a lie. There are no variants of Autons they are all the same, new series or old series. The current one shows what an Auton is in general, without actually showing a specific type of Auton (i.e on the Master page we would not show on incarnation of the Master). The idea of the mian Auton article is to show Auton in general (as the current one does) and not to show specific type of Auton or Nestene duplicate, as we have articles for them. Mini-mitch\talk 19:24, June 30, 2011 (UTC)