Forum:Chat extension: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Ausir-fduser (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:I was just contemplating that today. We actually have a forum consensus for such a thing, Okay, [[forum:IRC channel|that thread]] argued for an IRC channel, but the consensus could easily be interpreted as supporting a MediaWiki extensions that achieves the same thing. I've no objections to the notion. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} <span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">'''05:33:22 Tue '''12 Jul 2011 </span> | :I was just contemplating that today. We actually have a forum consensus for such a thing, Okay, [[forum:IRC channel|that thread]] argued for an IRC channel, but the consensus could easily be interpreted as supporting a MediaWiki extensions that achieves the same thing. I've no objections to the notion. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} <span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">'''05:33:22 Tue '''12 Jul 2011 </span> | ||
::If no one objects, I can activate it today. If you don't like it after all, it can always be switched off. [[User:Ausir|Ausir]]<sup>[[User talk:Ausir|(talk)]]</sup> <staff/> 14:33, July 12, 2011 (UTC) | ::If no one objects, I can activate it today. If you don't like it after all, it can always be switched off. [[User:Ausir|Ausir]]<sup>[[User talk:Ausir|(talk)]]</sup> <staff/> 14:33, July 12, 2011 (UTC) | ||
==Policy== | |||
:::To follow along with this activation, I've written up a [[tardis:chat policy|chat policy]]. Obviously we can talk about the policy implications over time and modify that policy by consensus. But it was important to have some kind of policy in place as quickly as possible. We need to have some limits staked out clearly from the very start. I've also done some testing to define what can and can't be done with the software. These findings are in the policy document. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} <span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">'''23:53:08 Tue '''12 Jul 2011 </span> | |||
Revision as of 23:53, 12 July 2011
Index → Panopticon → Chat extension
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
What do you think about activating the new Chat extension on this wiki? You can see it in action at e.g. The Vault. Ausir(talk) <staff/> 02:50, July 12, 2011 (UTC)
- I was just contemplating that today. We actually have a forum consensus for such a thing, Okay, that thread argued for an IRC channel, but the consensus could easily be interpreted as supporting a MediaWiki extensions that achieves the same thing. I've no objections to the notion.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ <span style="">05:33:22 Tue 12 Jul 2011
Policy
- To follow along with this activation, I've written up a chat policy. Obviously we can talk about the policy implications over time and modify that policy by consensus. But it was important to have some kind of policy in place as quickly as possible. We need to have some limits staked out clearly from the very start. I've also done some testing to define what can and can't be done with the software. These findings are in the policy document.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ <span style="">23:53:08 Tue 12 Jul 2011
- To follow along with this activation, I've written up a chat policy. Obviously we can talk about the policy implications over time and modify that policy by consensus. But it was important to have some kind of policy in place as quickly as possible. We need to have some limits staked out clearly from the very start. I've also done some testing to define what can and can't be done with the software. These findings are in the policy document.
