Forum:Romana's Incarnations' Names: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(New page: {{Forumheader|Panopticon}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> Should Romana's incarnations be called Romana I, [[Roman...) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
I'm in favour of keeping it as it is (Romana I etc), as this is how she is described in various reference texts and DWM. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 12:54, 18 January 2008 (UTC) | I'm in favour of keeping it as it is (Romana I etc), as this is how she is described in various reference texts and DWM. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 12:54, 18 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
:I think it should stay as it is - after all, we don't really know which regenerations they were. | |||
Revision as of 15:13, 18 January 2008
Index → Panopticon → Romana's Incarnations' Names
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
Should Romana's incarnations be called Romana I, Romana II and Romana III as they are called now, or First Romana, Second Romana, Third Romana.
I'm in favour of keeping it as it is (Romana I etc), as this is how she is described in various reference texts and DWM. --Tangerineduel 12:54, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
- I think it should stay as it is - after all, we don't really know which regenerations they were.
