Forum:Romana's Incarnations' Names: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:


:I think it should stay as it is - after all, we don't really know which regenerations they were.
:I think it should stay as it is - after all, we don't really know which regenerations they were.
The Doctor is under First Doctor so these articles should be placed under First Romana etc. [[User:Skittles the hog|Skittles the hog]] 21:19, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:19, 21 January 2008

IndexPanopticon → Romana's Incarnations' Names
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.


Should Romana's incarnations be called Romana I, Romana II and Romana III as they are called now, or First Romana, Second Romana, Third Romana.

I'm in favour of keeping it as it is (Romana I etc), as this is how she is described in various reference texts and DWM. --Tangerineduel 12:54, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

I think it should stay as it is - after all, we don't really know which regenerations they were.

The Doctor is under First Doctor so these articles should be placed under First Romana etc. Skittles the hog 21:19, 21 January 2008 (UTC)