Talk:A Fix with Sontarans (TV story): Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(→Title) |
m (fixing red link to forum) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Canon? == | == Canon? == | ||
Now, at first glance, this story appears to be non-canon. Most agree this story is such. However, as [[ | Now, at first glance, this story appears to be non-canon. Most agree this story is such. However, as [[ST]]: ''[[Fixing a Hole]]'' is created to be a seaqel to this story, then shouldn't it be cannon? | ||
We've used this LoJack on other pages, like [[Dimensions in Time]]. Now, it was created to be canon, but is very confusing, like many Doctor Who episodes. The only reason given for it to be Non-canical is that [[NA]]: ''[[First Frontier]]'' says so. So, even though we (and I) may not like it, this story may be canon... But what do you guys think? [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|talk to me, baby.]]) 00:38, January 11, 2012 (UTC) | We've used this LoJack on other pages, like [[Dimensions in Time]]. Now, it was created to be canon, but is very confusing, like many Doctor Who episodes. The only reason given for it to be Non-canical is that [[NA]]: ''[[First Frontier]]'' says so. So, even though we (and I) may not like it, this story may be canon... But what do you guys think? [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|talk to me, baby.]]) 00:38, January 11, 2012 (UTC) | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:::Plus, I don't think you can really argue that the ST sequel is non canon, I mean, the BE crossover with the Dalek films is still canon, right? I think this discussion is a bit too big and important for a Talk page... I'm going to request it be opend to a forum, similar to [[Forum:Is The Curse of Fatal Death canon?]] [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|talk to me, baby.]]) 01:47, January 11, 2012 (UTC) | :::Plus, I don't think you can really argue that the ST sequel is non canon, I mean, the BE crossover with the Dalek films is still canon, right? I think this discussion is a bit too big and important for a Talk page... I'm going to request it be opend to a forum, similar to [[Forum:Is The Curse of Fatal Death canon?]] [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|talk to me, baby.]]) 01:47, January 11, 2012 (UTC) | ||
I hope you don't mind, but I have moved your above comment to [[Forum:Is A Fix With | I hope you don't mind, but I have moved your above comment to [[Forum:Is A Fix With Sontarans Canon?]], with citation, of coarse. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|talk to me, baby.]]) 02:28, January 11, 2012 (UTC) | ||
== Title == | == Title == | ||
Because the episode does not, in fact, have a title ''as broadcast'', the origin of the name, which I don't in itself dispute, must be spelled out in the article before the {{tl|conjecture}} note can be removed. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} <span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">19:06: Wed 11 Jan 2012 </span> | Because the episode does not, in fact, have a title ''as broadcast'', the origin of the name, which I don't in itself dispute, must be spelled out in the article before the {{tl|conjecture}} note can be removed. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} <span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">19:06: Wed 11 Jan 2012 </span> | ||
:Never mind. I'm an idiot. Or all that colour in the Colin Baker titles burned out my eyes. It is indeed titled on broadcast. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} <span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">21:19: Wed 11 Jan 2012 </span> | :Never mind. I'm an idiot. Or all that colour in the Colin Baker titles burned out my eyes. It is indeed titled on broadcast. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} <span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">21:19: Wed 11 Jan 2012 </span> | ||
Revision as of 22:22, 11 January 2012
Canon?
Now, at first glance, this story appears to be non-canon. Most agree this story is such. However, as ST: Fixing a Hole is created to be a seaqel to this story, then shouldn't it be cannon?
We've used this LoJack on other pages, like Dimensions in Time. Now, it was created to be canon, but is very confusing, like many Doctor Who episodes. The only reason given for it to be Non-canical is that NA: First Frontier says so. So, even though we (and I) may not like it, this story may be canon... But what do you guys think? OS25 (talk to me, baby.) 00:38, January 11, 2012 (UTC)
- Without a doubt, I think that both AFwS and its ST sequel are both non-canonical. There's too much that has changed since it first aired to be able to slip in into canonicity, even if they were originally supposed to be canonical (which I kinda doubt). Tardis1963 talk 00:42, January 11, 2012 (UTC)
- Well, I doubt it was supposed to be canon too, but like I said, Dimensions in Time WAS supposed to be canon, but isn't now, so...
- Plus, I don't think you can really argue that the ST sequel is non canon, I mean, the BE crossover with the Dalek films is still canon, right? I think this discussion is a bit too big and important for a Talk page... I'm going to request it be opend to a forum, similar to Forum:Is The Curse of Fatal Death canon? OS25 (talk to me, baby.) 01:47, January 11, 2012 (UTC)
I hope you don't mind, but I have moved your above comment to Forum:Is A Fix With Sontarans Canon?, with citation, of coarse. OS25 (talk to me, baby.) 02:28, January 11, 2012 (UTC)
Title
Because the episode does not, in fact, have a title as broadcast, the origin of the name, which I don't in itself dispute, must be spelled out in the article before the {{conjecture}} note can be removed.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ <span style="">19:06: Wed 11 Jan 2012
