Forum:Doctor Who: Worlds in Time: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Wouldn't it make sense to create an article for it already when it's in beta stage, even if we don't add information from it to other articles yet? After all, we do have an article on [[Series 7]]. [[Special:Contributions/78.8.48.6|78.8.48.6]]<sup>[[User talk:78.8.48.6#top|talk to me]]</sup> 01:27, February 23, 2012 (UTC) | Wouldn't it make sense to create an article for it already when it's in beta stage, even if we don't add information from it to other articles yet? After all, we do have an article on [[Series 7]]. [[Special:Contributions/78.8.48.6|78.8.48.6]]<sup>[[User talk:78.8.48.6#top|talk to me]]</sup> 01:27, February 23, 2012 (UTC) | ||
:According to our previous discussions over the years on this matter, no. Series articles are specifically mentioned by [[T:SPOIL]] as the one area of exception within the main [[namespace]] for spoilers. This allows people who want to spoil a place to focus their energies. But it also says to those users who don't ''want'' to be spoiled a clear page to avoid. We really ''don't'' want this wiki turning into a place where spoilers are completely unregulated, so that we can benefit from the contributions of editors who don't want to be spoiled. | |||
:I understand the frustration with ''this particular'' video game story — because you probably think of it as being ''effectively'' released — but wiki administration is simply easier if we have clear rules and we follow them. | |||
:We're going to need to have a discussion on what "counts" in this game and what doesn't, anyway. We've never had to deal with an MMORPG, and it brings up a number of issues over what parts of the story happen canonically and which don't. Obviously, different players will have different experiences in such a game. So does your run through the game reveal the canonical "truth" of the game? It's an interesting question that Wookieepedia have to deal with on a regular basis, but which our particular fandom never has. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} <span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">02:41: Thu 23 Feb 2012 </span> | |||
Revision as of 02:41, 23 February 2012
Index → Panopticon → Doctor Who: Worlds in Time
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
I know I have not edited in ages, but I started playing Doctor Who; Worlds in Time, after seeing it advertised in Doctor Who Magazine, I typed in on google Doctor Who WIT (Short for WorldsInTime). I began an account and started playing, it is a really good game. I decided to do a search on here, but found an article had not been made, It is a really good game Hope you can help Catkind121 23:29, February 18, 2012 (UTC)
- [Spoilers hidden in above message.]
- The reason there's no article is that it's not been officially released. As far as we can tell, you're playing a beta or preview version, which means the game is therefore ineligible for an article. See this thread for more.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ <span style="">14:54: Tue 21 Feb 2012- And just to confirm that they're still in beta, here's twitter exchange:
- Michael French @Michael_French
- They appear to have softlaunched the new Doctor Who online game - @DoctorWhoWIT - by Three Rings (now owned by Sega) doctorwhowit.com
- Michael French @Michael_French
- And just to confirm that they're still in beta, here's twitter exchange:
- Worlds In Time @DoctorWhoWIT
- @Michael_French Yes! We are still in preview, but there is plenty of game for fans to play through. :)
- Worlds In Time @DoctorWhoWIT
- 9:24 AM - 8 Feb 12 via web
Wouldn't it make sense to create an article for it already when it's in beta stage, even if we don't add information from it to other articles yet? After all, we do have an article on Series 7. 78.8.48.6talk to me 01:27, February 23, 2012 (UTC)
- According to our previous discussions over the years on this matter, no. Series articles are specifically mentioned by T:SPOIL as the one area of exception within the main namespace for spoilers. This allows people who want to spoil a place to focus their energies. But it also says to those users who don't want to be spoiled a clear page to avoid. We really don't want this wiki turning into a place where spoilers are completely unregulated, so that we can benefit from the contributions of editors who don't want to be spoiled.
- I understand the frustration with this particular video game story — because you probably think of it as being effectively released — but wiki administration is simply easier if we have clear rules and we follow them.
- We're going to need to have a discussion on what "counts" in this game and what doesn't, anyway. We've never had to deal with an MMORPG, and it brings up a number of issues over what parts of the story happen canonically and which don't. Obviously, different players will have different experiences in such a game. So does your run through the game reveal the canonical "truth" of the game? It's an interesting question that Wookieepedia have to deal with on a regular basis, but which our particular fandom never has.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ <span style="">02:41: Thu 23 Feb 2012
