229,659
edits
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20151007072528/@comment-1827503-20171120084931 (edit)
Revision as of 14:39, 27 April 2023
, 27 April 2023Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
So, let's get to the point of the matter, then! | So, let's get to the point of the matter, then! | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
I do not believe there is any way to rationalise the gameplay of ''Legacy'' as valid. However, many of the points made in #23 of the ''Legacy'' thread support the game's narrative as valid, if we were to somehow separate the two. | I do not believe there is any way to rationalise the gameplay of ''Legacy'' as valid. However, many of the points made in #23 of the ''Legacy'' thread support the game's narrative as valid, if we were to somehow separate the two. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20151007072528-4028641/20171120084931-1827503]]</noinclude> | ||