User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20151007072528/@comment-1827503-20171120084931: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m
Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20151007072528/@comment-1827503-20171120084931'''
So, let's get to the point of the matter, then!
So, let's get to the point of the matter, then!


Line 5: Line 4:


I do not believe there is any way to rationalise the gameplay of ''Legacy'' as valid. However, many of the points made in #23 of the ''Legacy'' thread support the game's narrative as valid, if we were to somehow separate the two.
I do not believe there is any way to rationalise the gameplay of ''Legacy'' as valid. However, many of the points made in #23 of the ''Legacy'' thread support the game's narrative as valid, if we were to somehow separate the two.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20151007072528-4028641/20171120084931-1827503]]</noinclude>
Tech, Bots, Bureaucrats, emailconfirmed, Administrators
230,341

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.