68,651
edits
More actions
Forum:More complaints about the discontinuity sections (edit)
Revision as of 18:17, 15 June 2008
, 15 June 2008no edit summary
KingAragorn (talk | contribs) (New page: {{Forumheader|Panopticon}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> Hi, I don't think I've ever really contributed here, but I d...) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Hi, I don't think I've ever really contributed here, but I do read it often - so keep up the great work! Currently the article pages seem to be slightly 'messy'; I'm refering to the way in which under the 'Discontinuity, Plot Holes, Errors' section people write how peoples ideas are wrong - I think that if they are wrong it should be removed, put on the discussion page with the reasons why it's wrong. It's just something which bugs me as it's handled very differently on similar wikis.--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 17:15, 15 June 2008 (UTC) | Hi, I don't think I've ever really contributed here, but I do read it often - so keep up the great work! Currently the article pages seem to be slightly 'messy'; I'm refering to the way in which under the 'Discontinuity, Plot Holes, Errors' section people write how peoples ideas are wrong - I think that if they are wrong it should be removed, put on the discussion page with the reasons why it's wrong. It's just something which bugs me as it's handled very differently on similar wikis.--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 17:15, 15 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
:The Discontinuity section sort of grew from the classic series where there was defined bits (like boom mics in shot), or jump cuts, or items switching hands, or actual errors. For the new series articles it has become a bit of a dumping ground for people to have their own little forum within the article. For the most part it's easy enough to keep in control, some of the points are valid enough. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 18:17, 15 June 2008 (UTC) | |||