Forum:More complaints about the discontinuity sections: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:


:The Discontinuity section sort of grew from the classic series where there was defined bits (like boom mics in shot), or  jump cuts, or items switching hands, or actual errors. For the new series articles it has become a bit of a dumping ground for people to have their own little forum within the article. For the most part it's easy enough to keep in control, some of the points are valid enough. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 18:17, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
:The Discontinuity section sort of grew from the classic series where there was defined bits (like boom mics in shot), or  jump cuts, or items switching hands, or actual errors. For the new series articles it has become a bit of a dumping ground for people to have their own little forum within the article. For the most part it's easy enough to keep in control, some of the points are valid enough. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 18:17, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
::in general, contributors to the Wiki like giving justifying evidence or counter-evidence for their particular theories on canon. (personally, I don't like that.) --[[User:Stardizzy2|Stardizzy2]] 19:22, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
8,058

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.